binaryen
kaleidoscope
Our great sponsors
binaryen | kaleidoscope | |
---|---|---|
9 | 9 | |
2,007 | 1,017 | |
- | - | |
3.4 | 0.0 | |
over 1 year ago | about 4 years ago | |
Haskell | Haskell | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
binaryen
-
Building problems for using `Asterius` to compile Haskell to Webassembly.
I've encountered a building problem when using asterius to compile a multi-packages cabal project, the detail could be found here, any suggestions?
-
Options for a frontend of demo for a toy app
ghcjs is the way to go for you, and soon it might be asterius. i do not know how hard it is to set ghcjs up without a framework. but frameworks like obelisk (based on reflex-dom), shpadoinkle, and miso automate that for. i personally like obelisk for its functional reactive programming but it can get awkward and get in your way. so if gui programming is just a means to the end of this one small application and you are not really interested in it nor functional reactive programming, shpadoinkle or miso might suit you better. miso implements the elm architecture (also "TEA", "functional model view controller") and shpadoinkle implements something directly equivalent to the elm architecture. but shpadoinkle achieves more composable widgets by minimalizing the elm architecture. so i recommend shpadoinkle for its better concept although miso is more mature.
-
hint: Runtime Haskell interpreter
Also, hint uses unsafeCoerce, and thus implicitly relies on an assumption about how values are represented at runtime. Namely, if a program P is interpreting an expression E of type A, hint assumes that the value of type A produced by the ghc interpreter has the same representation as the values of type A which are manipulated by program P. This is not guaranteed to be the case, since P has been compiled by the compiler portion of ghc while E has been evaluated by the interpreter portion of ghc. This means the ghc devs had to carefully craft their compiler and interpreters to match. When targetting the browser, a Haskell-to-js or Haskell-to-wasm compiler such as Asterius modifies ghc's code-generator so it produces js or wasm code. You would thus also need to tweak the interpreter so that it produces js or wasm values which match what the modified code-generator outputs. Or you could restrict yourself to the hint's less expressive eval :: String -> String API.
-
M1Pro Woes
We found a post where someone had a similar issue (here), but the fix in that issue doesn't help: using `ar` from `binutils` causes link errors like this instead:
-
Pandoc in the browser w/ lua (possible contract gig?)
https://github.com/tweag/asterius/issues/851 (asterius has a demo, but no source, and I -assume no lua filter support)
-
It seems like every top tier team I work in insists on Yarn over NPM, almost unanimously it seems like all of these killer devs know Yarn is the industry standard on serious projects. Why do all documentation across the web default to npm installation instructions and assume you're using npm?
All modern ones support Haskell: https://github.com/tweag/asterius
-
Is GHCJS stuck on GHC 8.6.5?
Another option is Asterius. I'm not familiar with the current state, and it's not had active development for about 3 months now, either, so it may be in the same boat? But I think the big disadvantage of Asterius is that there's just a lot less usage, and therefore a lot less testing with the whole Haskell ecosystem, versus GHCJS which has been a fixture for a while and where loads of people have thought about compatibility for years.
-
Haskell to JS
Check out asterius
-
WebAssembly Studio
I've played around with Haskell via the Asteruis project : https://github.com/tweag/asterius
Also emscripten of course, for C/C++.
kaleidoscope
- Implementing a JIT Compiled Language with Haskell and LLVM (2017)
-
Should I abandon using haskell for my compiler?
Comparing the haskell and cpp implementations of the LLVM tutorial lead me to believe it might be faster to learn haskell and implement the compiler in haskell than to implement it in cpp.
-
What would be your programming language of choice to implement a JIT compiler ?
I think for writing compilers Haskell deserves to make the list. It is really excellent at creating DSLs. https://www.stephendiehl.com/llvm/
-
Proposal to Merge Pyston with Cpython
I'm no expert, but you might be interested in: https://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/
There's also a Haskell version if you'd prefer: https://www.stephendiehl.com/llvm/
Idk how to do this in python as I'm not really good with it, but in C, to make your compiler a JIT, you would `mmap` a region as writeable, write the machine code to it that you already know how to generate, `mprotect` it as PROT_EXEC instead of PROC_WRITE, cast the pointer to the region to a function pointer, and then call it. These functions may be available in the python sys package but I don't really know.
I've implemented a "JIT" that takes machine code as hex and does this. Warning: it's complete garbage with no error checking but is a good proof of concept. https://gist.github.com/martinjacobd/3ee56f3c7b7ce621034ec3e...
- Why does Rust have parameters on impl?
-
Implementing a LLVM Micro C compiler in Haskell
This is amazing. I tried following Stephen Diehl's JIT compiler in LLVM tutorial[0] a few years ago but it was already outdated (the llvm-hs library changed quite a bit), and subsequent web searches didn't turn up much.
For those interested in tutorials like this, I'd also recommend a very literate Haskell compiler for the PCF language to C[1], which is essentially lambda calculus with some primitives.
[0] https://www.stephendiehl.com/llvm/
[1] https://github.com/jozefg/pcf/
- Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers
-
Need some help with monad transformers
I'm currently working with llvm-hs-pure and am struggling to properly emit code for a module. I basically followed https://www.stephendiehl.com/llvm/#chapter-3-code-generation and have types like:
-
Advanced books / tutorials about Haskell?
http://www.stephendiehl.com/llvm/ Implementing a JIT Compiled Language with Haskell and LLVM Nice tutorial. Requires knowledge of monads, applicatives, transformers. Deep enough and more or less 'real world'.
What are some alternatives?
proposals - Tracking WebAssembly proposals
hyper-haskell-server - The strongly hyped Haskell interpreter.
ajhc - A fork of jhc. And also a Haskell compiler.
dhall - Maintainable configuration files
pcf - A small compiler for PCF
unbound - Replib: generic programming & Unbound: generic treatment of binders
haste-compiler - A GHC-based Haskell to JavaScript compiler
uu-cco - Tools for the CCO (Compiler Construction) course at the UU (Utrecht University)