assert-failure VS free

Compare assert-failure vs free and see what are their differences.

assert-failure

syntactic sugar that improves the usability of 'assert' and 'error' in Haskell (by Mikolaj)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
assert-failure free
0 3
2 157
- -
2.7 4.1
7 months ago 9 days ago
Haskell Haskell
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

assert-failure

Posts with mentions or reviews of assert-failure. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning assert-failure yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

free

Posts with mentions or reviews of free. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-18.
  • Stack-safety for free?
    3 projects | /r/rust | 18 Nov 2021
    That's an awesome tagline! I have a Haskell background and was alluding to "Monads for free" from the free package when picking the title "Stack-safety for free?" Alluding to Rust's "fearless concurrency" seems so much more appropriate though.
  • [ANN] merge, cropty, and trust-chain
    2 projects | /r/haskell | 18 Sep 2021
    https://hackage.haskell.org/package/trust-chain is a little more out there, but the most interesting to me personally. There are two ways to think about it, each useful to different audiences. On one hand, it can be seen as a tree where the node structure and leaf type are type level parameters, and every internal node is signed by the private key corresponding to the public key at that node. In Haskell, it can be seen as a free monad where every layer is signed in that same way.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing assert-failure and free you can also consider the following projects:

Free Category - Free categories, free arrows and free categories with monadic actions

distributed-process-platform - DEPRECATED (Cloud Haskell Platform) in favor of distributed-process-extras, distributed-process-async, distributed-process-client-server, distributed-process-registry, distributed-process-supervisor, distributed-process-task and distributed-process-execution

capability - Extensional capabilities and deriving combinators

extensible-effects - Extensible Effects: An Alternative to Monad Transformers

mmorph - Monad morphisms

ImperativeHaskell - Proof that Haskell can look and act like an imperative language.

tardis

pipes - Compositional pipelines

free-operational - Operational-style Applicative, Alternative, Monad and MonadPlus, using free monads.

free-er

ChannelT - Generalized stream processors

auto - Haskell DSL and platform providing denotational, compositional api for discrete-step, locally stateful, interactive programs, games & automations. http://hackage.haskell.org/package/auto