ASP.NET Core VS eShopOnContainers

This approach to organizing middleware enhances code readability, maintainability, and reusability. By following this encapsulation pattern, you're adhering to best practices in ASP.NET Core development, ensuring your application remains well-organized and scalable.

🌟.NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET 9 Preview 2 Discussion ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 Release Notes ➡️EF Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET Aspire preview 4 - .NET Aspire

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/50643

Even if you look at Microsoft’s by far most popular GitHub project, they’re still only half as big as SupaBase. If you believe “the SupaBase story”, SupaBase grew and became twice as large as Microsoft in 3 years. Below is their likes over time if you’re curious, together with a couple of additional “too good to be true” Silicon Valley projects.

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/10117

To achieve these objectives, we will take inspiration from ASP.NET Core Identity's PasswordHasher class. It incorporates a concept of hash versioning, allowing only the number of iterations to be modified.

yes I watched several courses, may be aim not getting clearly. but i worked with asp.net which uses http call and firebase cloud function also which uses socket connection, for socket connection its makes sense to use observable bcoz there streams of data we can observe once the connection establish ,but for http it need to be call every time.

As I'm not utilizing ASP.NET, despite its resource-intensive nature and occasional unpredictability, I prefer the cost-free option. I'm hesitant to invest in EPPlus or engage in trials, and moreover, I am more proficient with Interop. Given the limited volume of records in my department, there's a preference for utilizing tools covered by our existing license. This avoids the need for navigating through layers of approval within the chain of command and ensures compliance with our contractual agreements and Microsoft's patch management, ultimately aligning with a cost-saving mindset.

The eShopOnContainers is pretty popular, have you seen it yet? https://github.com/dotnet-architecture/eShopOnContainers

so I was exploring eShopOnContainers a little bit, more specifically the messages queues part and it made me wonder how is it possible to ensure data consistency across microservices when using them. If I'm not mistaken this isn't even shown in the eShopOnContainers examples.

For an example of an aggregate if you're unfamiliar - https://github.com/dotnet-architecture/eShopOnContainers/blob/3169a933447f1013c069e2cad2805c5de1ce9fbf/src/Services/Ordering/Ordering.Domain/AggregatesModel/OrderAggregate/Order.cs

You can check out eShopOnContainers as a reference architecture if you want, but (assuming this is meant to be somewhat of an ad hoc solution rather than a paragon of software engineering) I'd minimize the number of deployable assemblies (1 + tests if possible) and avoid Docker, again unless you have a specific reason to use it.

For K8s, it has a whole directory with deployment scripts. https://github.com/dotnet-architecture/eShopOnContainers/tree/dev/deploy/k8s

Checked the eshop on containers which uses EF for writes with DDD. Queries uses Dapper with raw sql. https://github.com/dotnet-architecture/eShopOnContainers/blob/dev/src/Services/Ordering/Ordering.API/Application/Queries/OrderQueries.cs

Maybe Microsoft’s eShopOnContainers reference system?