aspnet-api-versioning VS api-guidelines

Here is a code example

- The DTOs on the server should generally not change without warning. A deprecation cycle should ideally be in place so consumers can keep up over time and front end development doesn't have to be lock-step with the services the consume. Ideally some period of time between service v1 being deprecated and service v2 being required to allow consumers to react ( in this case, you're the consumer, so be kind to yourself ). Deets: https://github.com/dotnet/aspnet-api-versioning

This API versioning can be parameterized with some options, including the default version or even how the versioning will be done, whether by URL, header or media type. For more details, you can access the official documentation.

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnet-api-versioning/tree/master/samples/aspnetcore/BasicSample/Controllers something like this

Could you not achieve what you want by using ASP.NET API versioning - there's a by namespace example here

A lista completa pode ser vista aqui: https://github.com/microsoft/aspnet-api-versioning/wiki/Version-Format

You don't have to use attributes. You can use conventions. See here.

AZURE API Guidelines

📝 "Microsoft REST API Guidelines" [link]

This is a great, thorough and in-depth document from Microsoft: https://github.com/microsoft/api-guidelines/blob/vNext/Guidelines.md

Thing is, I made some researches this morning, and I found nowhere a "data" wrapper, not in Microsoft API best practices [FR] (client is using Microsoft APIs), not in Microsoft API guidelines, not in OpenAPI offical specifications, nowhere in any blog I found this morning.

Microsoft REST API guidelines