arweave VS nano-node

For example, decentralized data storage projects like Filecoin, Arweave, and Sia posted 50-100% user growth, providing blockchain-powered alternatives to AWS, Google Cloud, and Dropbox for distributed app data security.

There are a few solutions:

https://www.arweave.org/

https://www.lighthouse.storage/

To me, they seem like the most useful stuff coming out of the blockchain industry.

Familiar DePIN initiatives include Helium, a Decentralized Wireless Network from 2019, Filecoin or Arweave for Cloud Storage.

Arweave is a permanent and decentralized web inside an open ledger.

Arweave

IPFS isn't the right use case for a dropbox clone. It behaves like a CDN with no persistence guarantees.

Arweave is better suited to archival storage. There are options for participants to ban particular types of content which may be illegal to host in their jurisdiction. This was designed to prevent the spread of CP, terrorism related info, etc. but that means it is also susceptible to DCMA issues too.

https://www.arweave.org/

Arweave is a community owned, decentralized and permanent data storage protocol. You can check it out here.

Arweave

I'd say so yeah, it's basically dot.com 2.0 right now with decentralised technologies. You have gazillion of blockchains, but also distributed data storages like IPFS / Arweave or Secure Multi Party Computation like Nillion. Along with Zero-Knowledge proof stack, it stands to reason you could redo many of the current services (not just payments) in a way which is anonymous and not owned/controlled by a single entity, whether corporate or institutional.

Almost every Nano node release includes new features to make spam harder. I think it will be very hard to spam Nano nowadays. Despite not being in the spotlight and Nano dropping in value, the team is surprisingly active. https://github.com/nanocurrency/nano-node/releases

There's some pending work on the horizon to change the database side of things, which has projected storage savings of up to 50%.

Main Site - nano.org

"This change does not address block work pre computation as it's still possible to generate proofs for a time point in the future." - Source

Time-bounded proofs of work - All Nano transactions require a Proof-of-Work (PoW) instead of a fee, and that PoW (currently) never expires. This means that spammers can slowly create 100,000 transactions + their PoW, & then release them all at once. Time-bounding PoW would 1) allow nodes to better track/manage unconfirmed transactions (e.g. dropping the lowest priority transactions if the election buckets get full), and 2) could limit how long PoW is valid for, preventing attackers from stacking transactions for weeks or months, and 3) possibly allow normal PoW difficulty to be lowered (good for wallets/exchanges that make a lot of transactions)