archinstall VS release

Compare archinstall vs release and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
archinstall release
199 1
5,622 6
3.2% -
9.4 0.0
6 days ago over 2 years ago
Python
GNU General Public License v3.0 only -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

archinstall

Posts with mentions or reviews of archinstall. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-06-27.

release

Posts with mentions or reviews of release. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Potabi Systems Development | ISSUE #4 - The Bootloader
    1 project | dev.to | 10 Sep 2021
    The image above represents an error I ran into while building Potabi on Sept-9, 2021. The build is currently supposed to be using the RE Base release b_1.0a-base, the files of which are listed below. For testing purposes, I grabbed the RE Base b_1.0a-base disc1.iso file, as listed in the release. I ran it in QEMU on my personal machine, where the difference in bases between here and on the FreeBSD virtual machine being used for builds should be non-existent. Since I am coming back into development a month after I last did anything, I cannot say with any certainty that this will provide anything useful, but on The Potabi Foundation YouTube Channel, I uploaded a timelapse of this build for fun, not even trying to use it to help debug anything. It shows no issue, as far as I can tell.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing archinstall and release you can also consider the following projects:

archfi - Arch Linux Fast Installer : tutorial installer

archinstall - Arch Linux installer - guided, templates etc. [Moved to: https://github.com/archlinux/archinstall]

Ventoy - A new bootable USB solution.

Cubic - The Official Web Site for Cubic (Custom Ubuntu ISO Creator) (https://github.com/PJ-Singh-001/Cubic)

archiso - Official archiso scripts Repository (read-only mirror)

Fido - A PowerShell script to download Windows or UEFI Shell ISOs

autorandr - Auto-detect the connected display hardware and load the appropriate X11 setup using xrandr

pdf-issues - Industry-based resolutions for issues and errata reported against any PDF-related specification

informant - An Arch Linux News reader and pacman hook

Super-UEFIinSecureBoot-Disk - Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk: Boot any OS or .efi file without disabling UEFI Secure Boot

gotop - A terminal based graphical activity monitor inspired by gtop and vtop

releases - dahliaOS ISO releases