apex VS traefik

Just skimmed through the generated one for go and seems like it's listing the package apex, which is archived (which usually means deprecated), so I'm not sure how useful the tool is!

Apex (label: contrib (easy)) Build, Deploy, and Manage AWS Lambda functions with ease

If this is a feature request for headersregexp, then you should place it in Traefik GitHub.

https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues/9879 ACME DNS provider broken since v2.9.9

I'm one of the many who hadn't heard of Traefic until MRSK mentioned it. The marketing seems very (overly?) targetted at cloud microservices and container-specific tech[1]. Is that just marketing, or is it really not a good fit for monoliths on bare-metal?

[1] https://github.com/traefik/traefik

You have now finally deployed an enterprise-grade Kubernetes cluster with k3s. You can now deploy some work on this cluster. Some components to take note of are for ingress, you already have Traefik installed, longhorn will handle storage and Containerd as the container runtime engine.

Traefik reverse proxy - https://github.com/traefik/traefik

Moved from https://nginxproxymanager.com/ to https://github.com/traefik/traefik

We use Traefik for Configuration Discovery in Docker Swarm (add a label with the sub-domain to the service and it will automatically be routed to), for simple setup I always found nginx-proxy to be easy to use with containers.

We use the Traefik load-balancer to expose our services, which we access as subdomains of localhost. In order ensure that we can access our Traefik-exposed services (and also the Traefik dashboard itself, you’ll need to add the following entries to /etc/hosts on your host machine:

While exploring popular projects such as etcd and especially traefik, I noticed a violation of the principle that states "interfaces should belong to the package that uses values of the interface type, not the package that implements those values." For example, Here we can see that ManagerFactory import Registry interface that placed here and implementations of this interface in the same package, which violates the aforementioned principle. Even if the interface is simply a specification, it should still be defined on the consumer side. Is it considered bad practice to follow what traefik does in this case or I doesn't understand somthing? P.S. I'm newcomer, so sorry if it's silly question.

I've played a bit with Traefik as reverse proxy and wanted to implement fail2ban for it, after switching from Nginx Proxy Manager. It finally works and successfully bans threat actors that conduct malicous HTTP requests. As soon as a multitude of HTTP errors are detected by fail2ban in Traefik's JSON access logs, the attacker's IP address is banned. I am using a dockerized fail2ban container and ban locally via iptables as well as optionally on Cloudflare, using Cloudflare's API. A ban notification via Telegram can also be configured.