ansible-role-hardening VS content

Compare ansible-role-hardening vs content and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
ansible-role-hardening content
1 7
494 2,076
- 2.7%
9.5 10.0
5 days ago 6 days ago
Jinja Shell
Apache License 2.0 GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

ansible-role-hardening

Posts with mentions or reviews of ansible-role-hardening. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • AKS worker-node host operating systems
    1 project | /r/AZURE | 21 Aug 2021
    Many thanks u/pixelavenger. While I did not (yet) find the specific CIS recommendation, but I did find this which indicates that disabling SCTP module is perhaps too strong a reaction if the only justification is disabling those networking features that are usually not used frequently (to reduce attack surface). Apparently there was a vulnerability in WebRTC's user-space SCTP implementation, which has hence been fixed. There seem to be no known vulnerabilities in linux kernel SCTP implementation. Do you think Azure Support might be requested to optionally enable SCTP kernel module in the images ? Thanks also for the idea about using Daemon-set approach, perhaps a bit kludgy for the needs, as one'd need to invent a way to synchronize the completion of Daemon-set's task of enabling SCTP and startup of application that needs SCTP. Still better than nothing at all.

content

Posts with mentions or reviews of content. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-04-17.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ansible-role-hardening and content you can also consider the following projects:

CIS-Ubuntu-20.04-Ansible - Ansible Role to Automate CIS v1.1.0 Ubuntu Linux 18.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS Remediation

flake8-bandit - Automated security testing using bandit and flake8.

RHEL8-CIS - Ansible role for Red Hat 8 CIS Baseline

hardening - Hardening Ubuntu. Systemd edition.

AMDH - Android Mobile Device Hardening

ansible-role-security - Ansible Role - Security

ansible-role-rhel8-stig - DISA STIG for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 - Ansible role generated from ComplianceAsCode Project

debops - DebOps - Your Debian-based data center in a box

lunasec - LunaSec - Dependency Security Scanner that automatically notifies you about vulnerabilities like Log4Shell or node-ipc in your Pull Requests and Builds. Protect yourself in 30 seconds with the LunaTrace GitHub App: https://github.com/marketplace/lunatrace-by-lunasec/

debian - Reliably provision Debian hosts

lynis - Lynis - Security auditing tool for Linux, macOS, and UNIX-based systems. Assists with compliance testing (HIPAA/ISO27001/PCI DSS) and system hardening. Agentless, and installation optional.