Jupyter Scala
cats-effect
Our great sponsors
Jupyter Scala | cats-effect | |
---|---|---|
6 | 34 | |
1,562 | 1,954 | |
0.2% | 1.7% | |
9.0 | 9.7 | |
8 days ago | 6 days ago | |
Scala | Scala | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Jupyter Scala
-
💐 Making VSCode itself a Java REPL 🔁
Checkout almond
- A Python-compatible statically typed language erg-lang/erg
-
EDA libraries for Scala and Spark?
What about https://github.com/alexarchambault/plotly-scala and https://almond.sh/
-
Is there any editor or IDE that supports Ammonite with inline dependencies?
I use Almond in JupyterLab, which has pretty solid code completion. In IntelliJ, you can create a scratch sc file and run lines of it in the Scala REPL. That's really convenient for code completion and I normally will use that when I'm testing something from a specific project.
-
Recommended option for "Java with different syntax"?
The UI part. There's only the scala REPL. I think the closest is a scala kernel for Jupyter notebooks, check this out: https://almond.sh/
-
An SQL Solution for Jupyter
We have used https://almond.sh/ to create a Spark SQL interpreter using Jupyter Notebooks - plus a whole lot more which you can see here: https://arc.tripl.ai/tutorial
After seeing many companies writing ETL using code we decided it was too hard to manage at scale so provided this abstraction layer - which is heavily centered around expressing business logic in SQL - to standardise development (JupyterLab) and allow rapid deployments.
cats-effect
-
A question about Http4s new major version
Those benchmarks are using a snapshot version of cats-effect. I don't know where that one comes from, but previously they were using a snapshot from https://github.com/typelevel/cats-effect/pull/3332 which had some issues (3.5-6581dc4, 70% performance degradation), which have since been resolved (see that PR for more info and comparative benchmarks).
-
The Great Concurrency Smackdown: ZIO versus JDK by John A. De Goes
Recently, CE3 has had similar issues reported across multiple repositories, almost an epidemic of reports!
-
40x Faster! We rewrote our project with Rust!
The one advantage Rust has over Scala is that it detects data races at compile time, and that's a big time saver if you use low level thread synchronization. However, if you write pure FP code with ZIO or Cats Effect that's basically a non-issue anyway.
-
Sequential application of a constructor?
See also cats-effect and fs2. cats-effect gives you your IO Monad (and IOApp to run it with on supported platforms). fs2 is the ecosystem’s streaming library, which is much more pervasive in functional Scala than in Haskell. For example, http4s and Doobie are both based on fs2.
-
Should I Move From PHP to Node/Express?
On the contrary, switching to the functional mindset, with something like Typelevel Scala3 and respective cats and cats-effect fs2 frameworks, helps to rethink a lot of designs and development approaches.
-
Next Steps for Rust in the Kernel
I think "better Haskell on JVM" (in contrast to "worse Haskell") is a good identity for Scala to have. (Please note that this is an intentional hyperbole.)
Of course, there are areas where Haskell is stronger than Scala (hint: modularity, crucial for good Software Engineering, is not one of them). And Scala has its own way of doing things, so just imitating Haskell won't work well.
Examples of this "better Haskell" are https://typelevel.org/cats-effect/ and https://zio.dev/ .
All together, Scala may be a better choice for you if you want to do Pure Functional Programming. And is definitely less risky (runs on JVM, Java libraries interop, IntelliJ, easy debugging, etc...).
None of the other languages you mentioned are viable in this sense (if also you want a powerful type system, which rules out Clojure).
I agree that Rust's identity is pretty clear: a modern language for use cases where only C or C++ could have been used before.
-
Java 19 Is Out
I would use Scala. I like FP and Scala comes with some awesome libraries for concurrent/async programming like Cats Effect or ZIO. Good choice for creating modern style micro-services to be run in the cloud (or even macro-services, Scala has a powerful module system, so it's made to handle large codebases).
https://typelevel.org/cats-effect/
https://zio.dev/
The language, the community and customs are great. You don't have to worry about nulls, things are immutable by default, domain modelling with ADTs and patter matching is pure joy.
The tooling available is from good to great and Scala is big enough that there are good libraries for typical if not vast majority of stuff and Java libs as a reliable fallback.
-
Typelevel Native
What took my interest is this (for both JVM and future multithreaded Scala native): https://github.com/typelevel/cats-effect/discussions/3070 Having the same threads poll available IO events and execute callbacks should improve performance greatly
-
Scala isn't fun anymore
The author is the creator of Monix and implemented the first version of cats-effect. He knows what he is doing.
-
Question about some advanced types
You want Kernmantle, which quite honestly shouldn't be hard to implement around Cats and cats-effect. In particular, although Kernmantle doesn't require the use of the Arrow typeclass, there happen to be Arrow (actually ArrowChoice) instances for both Function1 from the standard library and Kleisli from Cats itself, given a Monad instance for the Kleilsi's F[_] type parameter. In other words, we should be able to port Kernmantle from Haskell to Scala (with the Typelevel ecosystem) and instantly be able to use pretty much anything else from the Typelevel ecosystem, or wrapped with it, in our workflow graphs. Pure functions, monadic functions, applicative functions, GADTs with hand-written interpreters, any of it. I think this would be eminently worth doing.
What are some alternatives?
sparkmagic - Jupyter magics and kernels for working with remote Spark clusters
ZIO - ZIO — A type-safe, composable library for async and concurrent programming in Scala
Metals - Scala language server with rich IDE features 🚀
FS2 - Compositional, streaming I/O library for Scala
Vegas - The missing MatPlotLib for Scala + Spark
fs2-grpc - gRPC implementation for FS2/cats-effect
Apache Flink - Apache Flink
doobie-quill - Integration between Doobie and Quill libraries
Deeplearning4j - Suite of tools for deploying and training deep learning models using the JVM. Highlights include model import for keras, tensorflow, and onnx/pytorch, a modular and tiny c++ library for running math code and a java based math library on top of the core c++ library. Also includes samediff: a pytorch/tensorflow like library for running deep learning using automatic differentiation.
Kategory - Λrrow - Functional companion to Kotlin's Standard Library
Scio - A Scala API for Apache Beam and Google Cloud Dataflow.
Slick - Slick (Scala Language Integrated Connection Kit) is a modern database query and access library for Scala