fquery VS django-ninja

Similar benefits without codegen (based on decorator magic) for a python based stack:

https://github.com/adsharma/fquery

* Use dataclasses for both database schema and the user facing operations

Re: Conways law at Facebook

I was at Facebook when GraphQL was invented, maintaining a backend storage service where a core assumption was that storage should be reorganized based on access patterns and that predicates should be pushed down to storage where they can be executed more efficiently.

GraphQL was hard to push predicates down, because you don't know which of the edges were written in PHP.

My response was fquery[1], which is like what's being discussed here but with python as the source language instead of swift and amenable to preserving the largest possible query structure for backend optimizers, including SQL optimizers.

It has some early demos converting a GraphQL/fquery into SQL where possible. It should be possible to add enough metadata to fquery to identify if an edge is non-trivial (calls into another microservice) or trivial (can be optimized to a storage backend or SQL).

[1] https://github.com/adsharma/fquery

Django Ninja [1], it forever changed how I write Django project, in a way so elegant and productive.

[1]: https://django-ninja.dev/

Django Ninja is a RESTful wrapper for Django, while UtilMeta Python Framework uses a more concise declarative ORM Schema for Django and other future-supporting ORMs like sqlachemy and Peewee to build RESTful APIs more efficiently, and supports not only Django but all Python mainstream frameworks like Django, Flask, Starlette, FastAPI, Sanic, Tornado, etc.

I can't recommend [django-ninja](https://github.com/vitalik/django-ninja) enough. It's an easy to use, extremely fast, typed API for django. I've found it to be better in almost all aspects when compared to djangorestframework.

It's gaining popularity but is still widely unknown.

> The only place I really see Django at large companies is as an api using DRF or something.

This is not a bad thing. Using Django as an API backend is amazingly fast in terms of development time, especially with modern frameworks such as django-ninja [1].

Just use the built-in ORM to create models, write your endpoints, and use the built-in admin interface to play with the database if you don't have endpoints for everything.

There is also a less known feature of Django called admindocs [2], which automatically generates a human readable, hyperlinked documentation for your models and relations between them.

[1] https://django-ninja.rest-framework.com/

[2] https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.2/ref/contrib/admin/admi...

Personally, I also prefer django-ninja to DRF.

Actually that's not fully true. If you mix async and sync codes in django-ninja there will be some errors. Where's the proof ? django-ninja doesn't support async auth

Subscribe to this issue :D

Also recommend Django-Ninja. It basically reimplements fastapi's type and decorator-based API construction, but embedded directly in django so you have access to django's ORM and middleware library.