actions-workflow-samples VS semver

GitHub Actions for Azure (official examples): https://github.com/Azure/actions-workflow-samples

appcontent.yml - Used to deploy my app content to the Azure App Service. Using this sample provided by Microsoft, with very minor modifications.

It's using GitHub Secrets. This guide helps: https://github.com/Azure/actions-workflow-samples/blob/master/assets/create-secrets-for-GitHub-workflows.md

For this exercise we need a personal access token from github. To ensure that the action has access to the GitHub token which you, by the way, should never expose to the public - we will place it in the secrets of the repo.

First we'll need to make some repo secrets. Here's a nice guide from Azure explaining how to do just that. It isn't difficult at all.

Add Actions secrets for the FTPS credentials. In our example the secret names are WP_USER and WP_PASSWORD.

Yep. For the projects I’ve worked on, the Azure Functions for scheduling were in their own `functions` folder at the root of the repository. Upon successful deployment of the main app, we’d then deploy the functions. Aside from that deployment happening after the main app’s, we use the same deployment configuration as the official example for GitHub Actions with Python functions: https://github.com/Azure/actions-workflow-samples/blob/master/FunctionApp/linux-python-functionapp-on-azure.yml.

We have 1 user that we use for deployment. We keep the username and password of this user in a Secret (all platforms support some form of secrets, here is some docs on Github Actions specifically).

I followed the official documentation (Link) and used the pre-defined template and it worked out of the box.

Following the Semantic Versioning rules, you should raise the version number every time you need to publish your library. In your "package.json" file, you need to change the version number to reflect whether the changes are major, minor, or patch updates.

Semantic Versioning: An established convention for version numbers following the pattern MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH

Increases the major of the latest tag and prints it As per the Semver spec, it'll also clear the pre-release…

The reason for this is that software libraries and package managers, in general, but specifically here, rely on semantic versioning. Semantic versioning is really useful for distributing packages in a predictable way. What does this look like for our project?

For a more detailed and comprehensive guide on semantic versioning, visit https://semver.org

I believe neovim follows semantic versioning. https://semver.org/

Semver has been 2.0.0 for 10 years, look at the date of the assets. Multiple releases created today where none existed before. Not sure why someone is creating releases now, perhaps just some housekeeping/cleanup.

https://github.com/semver/semver/releases

All ELRS hardware will talk to all other ELRS hardware, including Radiomaster's ELRS transmitters and receivers. There are one or two exceptions from scummy companies that have been pilloried by the community, and you probably won't find them anymore. So long as the ELRS firmware running on both devices has the same major version number, you're good to go. ie. 3.3.1 will still talk to 3.0.1, but won't talk to 2.0.0. (The "major version" is the 1st number, the "minor version" is the 2nd number, and the "patch version" is the 3rd number. See Semantic Versioning for more info.)

If you're using semver, read the spec it's not overly long or hard to understand.

Semantic versioning actually has a clear rule about this: