actions-runner-controller VS github-action-tester

Compare actions-runner-controller vs github-action-tester and see what are their differences.

actions-runner-controller

Kubernetes controller for GitHub Actions self-hosted runners (by actions)

github-action-tester

Run tests when pull-requests are opened, or commits pushed. (by skx)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
actions-runner-controller github-action-tester
31 1
4,192 26
2.9% -
9.0 0.0
4 days ago almost 4 years ago
Go Shell
Apache License 2.0 -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

actions-runner-controller

Posts with mentions or reviews of actions-runner-controller. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-28.

github-action-tester

Posts with mentions or reviews of github-action-tester. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-08.
  • GitHub Actions Limitations and Gotchas
    19 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Sep 2021
    To be honest I've always found the best approach with most of these systems is to checking your magic as shell-scripts inside your repository.

    Then you're much much more portable. Want to run tests? Run ".ci/tests.sh", want to generate artifacts "make", or ".ci/build.sh".

    All systems, be they github actions, jenkins, gitlab-runners, and everything else allow you to clone/update your repository and run something from within it. Which keeps things mostly portable.

    I put together a simple github action a long time ago, but now of course I realize it is overkill:

    https://github.com/skx/github-action-tester/

What are some alternatives?

When comparing actions-runner-controller and github-action-tester you can also consider the following projects:

helm-charts - Jenkins helm charts

turnstyle - 🎟️A GitHub Action for serializing workflow runs

xmonad - The core of xmonad, a small but functional ICCCM-compliant tiling window manager

cache - Cache dependencies and build outputs in GitHub Actions

gitlab

azure-pipelines-agent - Azure Pipelines Agent 🚀

jenkins-std-lib - Bringing the Zen of Python to Jenkins.

ghat - 🛕 Reuse GitHub Actions workflows across repositories

act - Run your GitHub Actions locally 🚀

actions-runner-

test-ci-needs