WireMock.Net
TestFX
Our great sponsors
| WireMock.Net | TestFX | |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 5 | |
| 1,283 | 899 | |
| 3.1% | 0.8% | |
| 8.6 | 6.9 | |
| 13 days ago | 2 months ago | |
| C# | Java | |
| Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
WireMock.Net
-
Mock heavy tests
I'd say that without wanting to refactor the code a little bit (maybe moving those HttpClients into a service so that they are easily mocked) your best bet would be to use something like WireMock or MockHttp.
-
Please recommend a good API Mocking tool
WireMock
-
Usefully links for DotNet Backend Developers
WiremockNet https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net
-
Integration tests without API dependencies with ASP.NET Core and WireMock.Net
In this post, I'll explain how to create mocks for HTTP APIs in narrow integration tests using the WireMock.Net library.
-
Fake apis for testing
Recently was pointed to WireMock for testing purposes.
-
How do you Unit Test a WebAPI? What do you test?
I use WireMock (@ Java) to start a local webserver alongside the tests, this webserver will provide ‘real’ responses to the client. Here’s the C# equivalent: https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net
- Capturing Http requests for testing purposes
-
How do I mock the response from my authentication server for client integration tests?
You could try out WireMock.Net: https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/Using-WireMock-in-UnitTests
-
The only way to go fast, is to go well (TDD from Factorio)
Use WireMock to mock responses from the endpoint that FooClient interacts with. This lets you exercise all of the code contained in FooClient in a realistic way, without using mocks, but still get the different responses you expect.
TestFX
- Why won't FXRobot click my button?
-
Automating Java applications with JavaScript?
So for JavaFX the default one is TestFX. If you don't have the source code you probably need to find a tool able to locate them deierctly on your app. 5I didn't check if ti exists). Now for your initial question. TestFX is implmented in Java so if you really want to write you test in JS/TS you have to find a wrapper for your favorite language.
- JavaFX unit tests
-
What's the most interesting open-source project to study?
TestFX
-
How do I Junit test GUI applications?
Actual pure unit testing, you mock whatever the button interacts with outside of its unit with and see if they called with correct things or something. How useful this approach is, depends. Often it's more useful to test UI functionality with functional (or integration) tests, for example for javaFX with https://github.com/TestFX/TestFX or something similar.
What are some alternatives?
Moq - Repo for managing Moq 4.x [Moved to: https://github.com/moq/moq]
JUnit - A programmer-oriented testing framework for Java.
mockhttp - Testing layer for Microsoft's HttpClient library. Create canned responses using a fluent API.
JFoenix - JavaFX Material Design Library
SpecFlow - #1 .NET BDD Framework. SpecFlow automates your testing & works with your existing code. Find Bugs before they happen. Behavior Driven Development helps developers, testers, and business representatives to get a better understanding of their collaboration
Fluent Assertions - A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.1, .NET Core 3.0, .NET 6, .NET Standard 2.0 and 2.1. Supports the unit test frameworks MSTest2, NUnit3, XUnit2, MSpec, and NSpec3.
xUnit - xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for .NET.
AutoFixture - AutoFixture is an open source library for .NET designed to minimize the 'Arrange' phase of your unit tests in order to maximize maintainability. Its primary goal is to allow developers to focus on what is being tested rather than how to setup the test scenario, by making it easier to create object graphs containing test data.
dotnet-testcontainers - 🐋 A library to support tests with throwaway instances of Docker containers for all compatible .NET Standard versions. [Moved to: https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-dotnet]
Fine Code Coverage - Visualize unit test code coverage easily for free in Visual Studio Community Edition (and other editions too)