WebFundamentals VS web.dev

8. Web Fundamentals

https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/ https://web.dev/rail/

If you're just starting you dev journey out I wholeheartedly recommend: launchschool.com It will give you a rock solid foundation for JavaScript and the DOM API. Making a good web app it's not just about React. I'm telling that from experience. You should know the DOM API, CSS, HTML and various web idioms. These are some good and free resources for the above: https://javascript.info/ https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals https://web.dev/ Once you've read the fundamental stuff you continue learning more about React: https://reactjs.org/docs/getting-started.html https://epicreact.dev/ https://overreacted.io/

Yes! I really enjoy the Web Fundamentals series on Web.Dev (used to be HTML5 Rocks). I'm not as familiar with Mozilla resources, but I assume they have similar guides.

Also go thru this: https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals its a collection of docs on best practices in frontend.

Free resources(I dont think you can learn everything at one place, full stack development covers too many topics): https://www.w3schools.com/ https://web.dev netninja and fireship on youtube https://github.com/topics/epicreact-dev https://zerotomastery.io/resources/ https://digitalocean.com/community/tutorials https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals

Google's Web Fundamentals covers performance, amongst other things.

7. Web Fundamentals - Best practices for modern web development.

Before we start creating pages in our application, it's important to understand how Next.js renders content. The framework supports multiple rendering methods including server-side rendering (SSR), static site rendering (SSG), and client-side rendering (CSR). There are many pros and cons to each rendering method (too many to cover in this post) so if these concepts are new to you, Google’s web.dev site has a very good introduction to rendering on the web that can help you understand rendering options.

The lifecycle of an interaction. Source: web.dev

Probably not, it's the CSS used so far, so if there are elements you've not interacted with, that's an issue. This web.dev article gives some tools you can use https://web.dev/articles/extract-critical-css

I noticed the same for Google's site https://web.dev/

The last article pushed to the feed was "Changes to the web.dev infrastructure" few months ago https://web.dev/blog/webdev-migration

The feed still there but with no updates https://web.dev/feed.xml and on the site you can see new articles published.

Is sad that on a infrastructure revamp of a modern site, the RSS feed was left out of the features list (at least for now).

Upon testing on Firefox and Mi Browser, there was no triggering of the BeforeInstallPrompt event, as expected. However, I noticed that web.dev manages to display a prompt on these browsers, even though they theoretically lack support for the BeforeInstallPrompt event.

web.dev, maintained by Google, including posts by Chrome developers and their co-workers,

In a old web.dev articleI came across the word "Incremental (Re)Hydration" which is linked to a Glimmer.js-Blog post (also called "Incremental Rendering" there) confuses me. Is Incremental (Re)Hydration the same as Progressive (Re)Hydration? Reading the Glimmer-Blog article it seems so, but in the web.devarticle it seems to be something different.

Web.dev newsletter - though it's not a weekly newsletter and it's only content from web.dev (though really high quality content)

Just open up a text edi web developers are self-taught. a website. That's what I did. Some people like this: https://web.dev