WalletWasabi VS bips

When I use a search engine to find wasabi wallet, the top result is https://wasabiwallet.app/ However, on github, it says the offical site is https://wasabiwallet.io

Finally, fork Wasabi Wallet, remove what you don't need and add what you do: https://github.com/zkSNACKs/WalletWasabi

This is the list of supported operating systems https://github.com/zkSNACKs/WalletWasabi/blob/master/WalletWasabi.Documentation/WasabiCompatibility.md

For the record, this feature has been implemented already, but not released. I hope it'll make it to the next one: https://github.com/zkSNACKs/WalletWasabi/pull/10976

GitHub Discussion: https://github.com/zkSNACKs/WalletWasabi/discussions/10965

Hola. Te dejo el link al GitHub de la billetera Bitcoin 100% escrita en C# (front y back), 100% open source, en la que laburo como dev C# hace 1 año y medio aprox.

The Wasabi Wallet for Bitcoin Core, for example, manages this process almost unnoticed by the user in the background for an additional fee. The problem with this is that the system is a centralized single point of failure. State intervention cannot be ruled out. In addition, Wasabi excludes certain coins that are blacklisted, or whose origin is questionable, in order to "protect its users."

You can check its development activity on GitHub https://github.com/zkSNACKs/WalletWasabi/ if you care about that.

Not your key, not your coins. Go Non-custodial if you must. I use Wasabi Wallet mainly for the privacy.

Bitcoin transactions involve locking funds in scripts, which can only be spent if those locking conditions are met. The part of the script that expresses these locking conditions are called ScriptPubKeys. On the other hand, the part that provides unlocking scripts to satisfy the locking conditions is referred to as ScriptSig for legacy transactions, and ScriptWitness for SegWit Transactions. These scripts are evaluated by a stack-based language called Script. This article will mainly focus on ScriptPubKeys.

Here’s the reference https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0039.mediawiki

There are 5 271 537 971 301 488 476 000 309 317 528 177 868 800 possible permutations of the bip39 wordlist found here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0039/english.txt when using 12 word seeds. You probably have better change to win the lottery every week for the rest of your life than cracking a 12 word seed in correct order

No one controls Bitcoin, because it's a protocol. Bitcoin Core is the reference implementation, but there are others, and anyone can create new implementations if they wish. Also, the Bitcoin Core maintainers can't just change something on a whim, because users would then switch to another fork. Maintainers (or miners or other groups) can't force their changes on users, because everyone can decide on their own which version they want to use.

The protocol development happens through BIPs (Bitcoin improvement proposals): https://github.com/bitcoin/bips

BIPs are discussed for years, before (and if) they are implemented, and basically everyone needs to agree on them, because no one wants to fork the blockchain, which could be devastating.

All the seeds generated from the CoolWallet (Number / Word) adhere to the BIP-39 protocol.

> users would be required to hand over control of their wallet to actually manage the massive proliferation of addresses needed

BIP32 solved this in 2012, and is used by basically all self-custodial wallets these days. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawi...

> Which policy are we referring to?

* BIP 141 version bits and BIP 148 as a voting mechanism: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0141.mediawi... and https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0148.mediawi...

* core developer votes: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Segwit_support

* posturing and maneuvering: https://cointelegraph.com/news/samourai-wallet-intends-to-ru...

> It evolves in a decentralized and organic manner, devoid of any formal political process or voting.

Just because its voting mechanisms are informal, that doesn't make them not voting mechanisms.