Vale VS Aeron

Not to be confused with Vale[0].

[0] https://vale.dev/

The article says they created a deterministic hypervisor that runs all pseudorandom behavior from a starting seed to enable perfect re-playability.

But that's all we know so far. I'm assuming there'll be some sort of fuzz testing, and static analysis or some defining actions that your software can perform.

Honestly it sounds a lot like it has a lot of crossover with what the Vale language is trying to solve: https://vale.dev/, but focused on trying to get existing software to that state instead of creating a new language to make new software already be at that state by default.

Why go through all the trouble when you can do this: https://www.hylo-lang.org/ and not spend a second thinking of lifetimes? No, copies will not be issued unless necessary.

Or why not keep exploring this idea as well? More research-oriented than the first one right now, though, so take it with a grain of salt: https://vale.dev/

Another relevant language might be Vale (https://vale.dev), which is aiming for "perfect replayability": https://verdagon.dev/blog/perfect-replayability-prototyped

Interesting. Very low level though and C(++) centric. She there any thoughts on combining the hardware and OS features with rust or https://vale.dev ?

Use a runtime memory management solution that's cheaper than garbage collection (see Vale)

This seems like a tool I'll be using, and this is an almost meaningless criticism, but why the name?

There's already the Vale programming language (https://vale.dev/), but moreover, I don't get the meaning of "vale". You could call it something like Englint which actually hints its purpose.

Semi-related is the Aeron project: https://github.com/real-logic/aeron

- ez itt most egy izgalmasabb product (trading/matching engine, low latency code, aeron alapokon)

Look into Aeron for examples of high performance UDP message sending. We use it for high performance audio messaging, and I previously used it in high frequency trading https://github.com/real-logic/aeron. It is written in Java/C, but the general concepts of back pressure and reliable delivery over UDP are well documented.

They mention their training offer on the Aeron GitHub page here: https://github.com/real-logic/aeron

Yup the Disruptor paper actually shocked the industry a bit, b/c it was so out of place. BTW, Martin Thompson went on improving the Disruptor, and the result is the Aeron Protocol: https://github.com/real-logic/aeron

I was about to suggest Chronicle, but it looks like they have gone closed-source. The older version is still interesting to look through though. Aeron / Disruptor / SBE are good projects for inspiration as well.

We are using this Java Aeron (https://github.com/real-logic/aeron) to build our production distributed messaging cluster. As a Rust lover, Is there any similar lib or framework in our ecosystem to test benchmark with it?

Java: In the past years C++ in finance has been rapidly supplanted by Java thanks to breakthrough technologies in the past decade like LMAX Disruptor, Chronicle Queue, Azul JVM, and Aeron (not the ergonomic chair, but this one, the transport protocol that breaks kafka performance records out of the park - not really a full kafka replacement, as Kafka enforces subscriber GD and aeron is more of an OSI layer 4 better than TCP; google "Best-effort delivery vs reliable delivery"). There's plenty more but thanks to these technologies, they allowed a Java based stack to perform the latency and throughput requirements needed for high frequency trading/HFT. From top trading firms like Two Sigma to the New York Stock Exchange, they're in Java. For banks, large modern western banks worth their salt and have modernized their systems are dominated by Java, especially thanks to Azul. To list a few banks, ING, Wells Fargo, Credit Suisse, and Barclays are all in Azul. Even at work Java still dominates.