SimpleBLE VS SimpleBluez

BLE library for python without asyncio

For those who don't know about the project, SimplePyBLE contains the Python bindings for SimpleBLE, a cross-platform Bluetooth library specifically designed for use in desktop environments with a very simple API, allowing developers to easily integrate it into their projects without much effort.

It's been 5 months since the last SimpleBLE release, so I'm here to share what's new on SimpleBLE v0.6.0!

Hey all! I'm currently implementing Rust bindings for a C++ library and I need some feedback on what are proper architectures for exposing callbacks on the Rust side of the API. You can find the code I'm currently working on here: https://github.com/OpenBluetoothToolbox/SimpleBLE/blob/feature/rust/simplersble/src/lib.rs

I've received this request multiple times, so I think it's important enough to make sure it's part of the v0.6 release. I've made an issue to track this, feel free to follow: https://github.com/OpenBluetoothToolbox/SimpleBLE

Fixed the incorrect URLs. My bad on the usage docs, when I wrote this I was referring to the examples folder in the repo. I made it slightly better with some more specific guidance: https://github.com/OpenBluetoothToolbox/SimpleBLE/blob/main/docs/usage.rst

Internally, SimpleBLE is using CoreBluetooth on MacOS, WinRT on Windows and SimpleBluez/SimpleDBus (two other components that I wrote providing low-level access to DBus as well as Bluez abstractions). The library is extensively tested in terms of functionality as well as memory/thread sanity and I do feel confident about it being production ready. Tiny caveat: Most tests I run are manual, although I have plans for a proper hardware-in-the-loop CI pipeline if I get enough people interested / funding.