Scrutor VS Polly

You can with MS's default DI as well via scrutor.

if you are heavily invested in autofac you can replace the build in DI with another container. at this point i don't think it is that necessary. especially if you use scrutor. it gives your some nice assembly scanning registration that autofac/simple injector give https://github.com/khellang/Scrutor

If you wouldn't mind, I have one additional question. If I wouldn't bother to remove this loading, how could one add that as service when using DI? I have found tool called Scrutor (https://github.com/khellang/Scrutor), is it something commonly used in situation like this?

I much prefer using Scrutor and asbly scanning myself. https://github.com/khellang/Scrutor

you can also use Scrutor to get closer to Autofac functionality https://github.com/khellang/Scrutor

That can't be the only justification, because you can easily register services using reflection without using MediatR.

I might suggest additional registration time extensions to modify the behavior as needed on classes. Take a look at Scrutor for some inspiration on API specifically.

There is a package that simplifies it for you if you want. But not everybody agrees that automatic registration is good pattern, so you have a choice.

In our applications, we should wrap all requests to remote services in code that implements a retry policy that follows one of the strategies I listed earlier. If you are a .NET developer like myself, you may be familiar with the Polly library. Golang has a library called Retry, and there are numerous third-party libraries for Python and Java.

Another question that rises is, would it be better to use some HttpClient package to handle the requests, like Refit in combination with Polly. But then again, it seems Refit also uses the HttpClient factory, which was a bad thing according to the previous?

D'Oh! Sorry, not PolySharp. I meant Polly. Too many similarly-named libraries!

Everywhere I've worked with AGs, we've worked with the application team to add retry logic to help make things a bit more seamless to end users. There are libraries out there that can make this pretty easy - Polly is one that I've used a few times, but there are others.

Fallacy 1: The network is reliable. If system 2 works perfectly well, but is not accessible for service 1 due to network issues, service 2 is still unavailable. This is why timeouts, service breakers and retry policies exist. A great tool for .NET to handle common network issues is Polly, but even when using a tool like this, the network is still not completely reliable.

I see. Then I don't have any better idea right now, but I do want to suggest that if your script is mostly API calls and you want to be able to deal with failures then take a look at the polly library: https://github.com/App-vNext/Polly

Runs in containers nicely, has good integration with Kafka, RabbitMQ, gRPC, etc. for Microservices communication. Implements resiliency patterns you'd want in Microservices via Polly. Has a decent Dependency Injection framework built in by default.

It's in no way hidden. But I use Polly all the time.

Depending if the sender or the reciever is down, you can also try Polly http://www.thepollyproject.org/