Scrutor VS Json.NET

You can with MS's default DI as well via scrutor.

if you are heavily invested in autofac you can replace the build in DI with another container. at this point i don't think it is that necessary. especially if you use scrutor. it gives your some nice assembly scanning registration that autofac/simple injector give https://github.com/khellang/Scrutor

If you wouldn't mind, I have one additional question. If I wouldn't bother to remove this loading, how could one add that as service when using DI? I have found tool called Scrutor (https://github.com/khellang/Scrutor), is it something commonly used in situation like this?

I much prefer using Scrutor and asbly scanning myself. https://github.com/khellang/Scrutor

you can also use Scrutor to get closer to Autofac functionality https://github.com/khellang/Scrutor

That can't be the only justification, because you can easily register services using reflection without using MediatR.

I might suggest additional registration time extensions to modify the behavior as needed on classes. Take a look at Scrutor for some inspiration on API specifically.

There is a package that simplifies it for you if you want. But not everybody agrees that automatic registration is good pattern, so you have a choice.

This bug and many others related to time: https://github.com/JamesNK/Newtonsoft.Json/issues/862 And they will never get fixes, because the project is kind of dead. Edit: and actually, the creator claim to have made it like this on purpose, so I don't trust it anymore.

There's a related discussion on the GitHub repo:

Nuget is where you'll get 3rd party libraries (such as Newtonsoft.Json for JSON processing)

Common convention (with rare exceptions) is to name your project the same as your assembly name and default namespace. For example, Newtonsoft.Json.csproj makes an assembly called Newtonsoft.Json.dll with the default namespace of Newtonsoft.Json. Inside that project directory (which usually also has the same name), subdirectories would match namespaces nested inside the default, like in that example there is a folder named Serialization which contains classes that are all in the namespace Newtonsoft.Json.Serialization. Classes in this nested namespace can automatically access classes defined in parent namespaces without extra using statements, like how JsonProperty.cs can reference JsonConverter from the Newtonsoft.Json namespace, but it needs a using statement at the top of the file in order to access classes from the sibling namespace Newtonsoft.Json.Utilities

As I said, I'm not familiar with C# but on a quick Google it seems there isn't one idiomatic way to handle JSON in C# - instead a multitude of different libraries/packages for doing so. This seems... ...irritating. json.NET (https://www.newtonsoft.com/json) seems to be one of the best (but again, I don't know C#).

MonoGame abstracts a lot of the rendering work and is easy to use for 2D games (I haven't tested its 3D support so far). It also provides you with a content pipeline plus audio and input handlers. All that's left for you to do is roll your own Entity Component System, physics, and game logic. If you're not interested in writing your own physics, there are libraries out there already. Additionally, if you don't want to get caught up in the details of data serialization, Json.NET is a great package for serializing data in JSON format. That makes it perfect when paired with a map editor such as Tiled, which can export to JSON.

Also file an issue report with Newtonsoft because IMO that should not be happening.