RazorLight
redwood
Our great sponsors
RazorLight | redwood | |
---|---|---|
11 | 114 | |
1,479 | 16,726 | |
- | 0.5% | |
0.0 | 10.0 | |
6 months ago | 5 days ago | |
C# | TypeScript | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
RazorLight
-
Introducing TopazView: A Lightweight and Powerful View Engine
Yes, I have used Razor pages in non-website applications before where I needed to load the cshtml templates from a different source. I have written Line of Business apps (think WinForms or WPF) where the reporting spits out HTML with tables and charts. There are a number of similar projects to yours out there which I have used in the past such as RazorLight or RazorMachine.
- A Handlebar and Puppeteer Equivalent in C#?
-
Sending HTML based emails. Is there an easier way to dynamically generate the document?
Your mileage may vary but I've had good luck with the RazorLight library for generating HTML emails from a template with data merged in. Under the hood, it uses the ASP.NET Razor engine for applying a model to a template.
-
Email template engine
We use https://github.com/toddams/RazorLight in combination with serverless functions.
- Rendering HTML (C# windows forms) not working after deploy
-
Generating html in a hosted service
you could use a razor based engine to generate html based on a view model (your data). take a look at: https://github.com/toddams/RazorLight i use it to generate html emails
-
Don't make me think, or why I switched to Rails from JavaScript SPAs
Rails has a templating system for generating emails (standard HTML/ERB files). If you're running an ASP.NET Web API (not MVC) the best way of doing that I've found is via Razorlight which you have to set up manually - https://github.com/toddams/RazorLight
With Rails the standard is pretty much Devise or Omniauth (or both) - does everything for you. I've never found anything for ASP like Devise which gives you an entire login system with all the required views/migrations in a couple commands.
-
How would you setup a e-mail template / content in .NET in order to reference to templates when sending mail?
I use RazorLight: https://github.com/toddams/RazorLight
-
How to render a Razor view from a Console application?
Razor Light
- How do you manage transactional email templates?
redwood
-
Release Radar • February 2024 Edition
Frameworks are a theme with this month's Release Radar, so here's another. Redwood is a full-stack, JavaScript/TypeScript web application, designed to scale with you. It uses React frontend for the frontend and links to a custom GraphQL API for the backend. The latest version includes a bunch of breaking changes such as moving to Node 20.0, the Redwood Studio, and highly requested GraphQL features such as Realtime, Fragments, and Trusted Documents, the server file, new router hooks, and heaps more. If you've previously used Redwood, you'll probably want to upgrade to version 7.0. The team have put together a handy migration guide for you to follow.
-
The Current State of React Server Components: A Guide for the Perplexed
The other piece of important information to acknowledge here is that when we say RSCs need a framework, “framework” effectively just means “Next.js.” There are some smaller frameworks (like Waku) that support RSCs. There are also some larger and more established frameworks (like Redwood) that have plans to support RSCs or (like Gatsby) only support RSCs in beta. We will likely see this change once we get React 19 and RSCs are part of the Stable version. However, for now, Next.js is currently the only framework recommended in the official React docs that supports server components.
-
What will happen to the full-stack framework in the future?
Although there are quite a few opinionated battery-included frameworks that have picked up everything for you like RedwoodJS, Blitz, and Create-T3-App, you still need to choose between them and hope that they will remain mainstream and well-maintained in the future. So how should we choose?
-
NextJS vs RedwoodJS
Web development frameworks in JavaScript, such as NextJS and RedwoodJS, have gained popularity among developers. Choosing the right framework, library, or tool for a project is crucial for efficient development. Developers often seek the best tools to save time and avoid reinventing the wheel.
-
Ask HN: I'm abandoning NextJS. What's an alternative full-stack TS solution?
The community here is pretty friendly. https://redwoodjs.com/
-
Is Next.js 13 + RSC a Good Choice? I Built an App Without Client-Side Javascript to Find Out
Next.js 13 ignited the first wave of attention to React Server Components (RSC) around the end of last year. Over time, other frameworks, like Remix and RedwoodJS, have also started to put RSC into their future road maps. However, the entire "moving computation to the server-side" direction of React/Next.js has been highly controversial from the very beginning.
-
Enhancing Redwood: A Guide to Implementing Zod for Data Validation and Schema Sharing Between the API and Web Layers
I'm currently experimenting with the fantastic Redwood framework. However, while going through the excellent tutorial, I didn't find any guidance on using data validation libraries like Yup, Zod, Vest, etc. So, I had to do some investigation and came up with a solution. This article describes the implementation of validation with Zod in a fresh Redwood app. You can find the sources at this github repository.
-
ZenStack: The Complete Authorization Solution for Prisma Projects
RBAC is one of the most common authorization models - users are assigned different roles, and resource access privileges are controlled at the role level. Despite its limitations, RBAC is a popular choice for simple applications, and some frameworks (like RedwoodJS) have built-in support for it.
-
🏆 Top 5 full-stack JS frameworks in 2023 - which one should you pick for your next project? 🤔
Check it out here: https://redwoodjs.com/
- RedwoodJS: The App Framework for Startups
What are some alternatives?
RazorEngine - Open source templating engine based on Microsoft's Razor parsing engine
remix - Build Better Websites. Create modern, resilient user experiences with web fundamentals.
scriban - A fast, powerful, safe and lightweight scripting language and engine for .NET
Next.js - The React Framework
Handlebars.Net - A real .NET Handlebars engine
Blitz - ⚡️ The Missing Fullstack Toolkit for Next.js
DotLiquid - .NET Port of Tobias Lütke's Liquid template language.
Nest - A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient, scalable, and enterprise-grade server-side applications with TypeScript/JavaScript 🚀
Mustache Sharp - An extension of the mustache text template engine for .NET.
Gatsby - The best React-based framework with performance, scalability and security built in.
SmartFormat.NET - A lightweight text templating library written in C# which can be a drop-in replacement for string.Format
Strapi - 🚀 Strapi is the leading open-source headless CMS. It’s 100% JavaScript/TypeScript, fully customizable and developer-first.