Quick VS Mockingjay

Compare Quick vs Mockingjay and see what are their differences.

Mockingjay

An elegant library for stubbing HTTP requests with ease in Swift (by kylef)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Quick Mockingjay
3 -
9,756 1,488
0.1% -
8.3 0.0
15 days ago 6 months ago
Swift Swift
Apache License 2.0 BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Quick

Posts with mentions or reviews of Quick. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-02-28.
  • GitHub can't be trusted. Or, how suspending Russian accounts deleted project history and pull requests
    1 project | /r/coding | 20 Apr 2022
    Take this example mentioned in the blog post. It was merged into Quick:main from younata:fix_parallel_tests - until the PR was merged, the code resided in the user younata's profile. That's the point of PRs, right? It can't be merged into Quick unless it passes review and is merged. Therefore, when the (allegedly) Russian user's profile was removed it removed all of the commits on their profile - including anything un-merged. Anything already merged, and thus merged to the Quick project repository, has not been changed.
  • Mobile e2e tests using WebdriverIO and Appium
    5 projects | dev.to | 28 Feb 2021
    These tests are responsible for validating that a single unit is working properly. You can think of a unit as a class or function. These tests are written in an isolated fashion. I mean, if the rest of the system is full of bugs and nothing else work, if this unit work, the test will pass. They are also repeatable. They don't depend on anything else, really. Anytime you run the test, if the code hasn't changed, the test will report the same result. These tests are intimately related to the code quality of your project. If your code is clean, these tests should be relatively easy to write. When writing unit tests in iOS, you usually use XCTest or Quick
  • Quick – behavior-driven development framework for Swift and Objective-C
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 16 Jan 2021

Mockingjay

Posts with mentions or reviews of Mockingjay. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning Mockingjay yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Quick and Mockingjay you can also consider the following projects:

OHHTTPStubs - Stub your network requests easily! Test your apps with fake network data and custom response time, response code and headers!

Mockingbird - A Swifty mocking framework for Swift and Objective-C.

Cuckoo - Boilerplate-free mocking framework for Swift!

Nimble - A Matcher Framework for Swift and Objective-C

Mockit - A simple mocking framework for Swift, inspired by the famous http://mockito.org/

Kiwi - Simple BDD for iOS

Mockingbird - Simplify software testing, by easily mocking any system using HTTP/HTTPS, allowing a team to test and develop against a service that is not complete or is unstable or just to reproduce planned/edge cases.

SwiftyMocky - Framework for automatic mock generation. Adds a set of handy methods, simplifying testing. One of the best and most complete solutions, including generics support and much more.

Kakapo - 🐤Dynamically Mock server behaviors and responses in Swift

Sleipnir - BDD-style framework for Swift