Programming-Language-Benchmarks
Programming-Language-Benchmark
Our great sponsors
Programming-Language-Benchmarks | Programming-Language-Benchmark | |
---|---|---|
19 | 5 | |
592 | - | |
- | - | |
5.3 | - | |
about 1 month ago | - | |
C# | ||
MIT License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Programming-Language-Benchmarks
-
A Comprehensive Introduction to Golang
The benchmark available at https://programming-language-benchmarks.vercel.app/ demonstrates that Golang stands out as one of the most memory-efficient languages presently available. This achievement is attributable to several inherent features of Golang, such as its static typing, robust garbage collection system, and the inherent structuring of data within the language. These traits collectively contribute to Golang's exceptional efficiency in terms of minimal memory consumption compared to other languages.
- Rust vs Zig Benchmarks
-
Ask HN: What are some of the most elegant codebases in your favorite language?
I found Zig implementation of json parsing is interesting. The code is free from hidden control flow !.
https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark...
-
why does this while loop run instantly
I think https://programming-language-benchmarks.vercel.app/ is a good starting point to compare languages and compilers, also implementations are optimized for the specific language so you don't end up with a poorly ported c++ implementation in rust and wonder why it performs so bad.
- Why did tiger beetle choose zig over rust?
-
How fast is JIT compiled Lua/JavaScript compared to static compiled C++ and Rust measured in runtime?
It varies a lot depending on what the code consists of, but if you want concrete numbers for certain benchmarks, this site might be of interest: https://programming-language-benchmarks.vercel.app/
-
Speed Comparisons: JavaScript vs Python vs C vs Rust
There is not "one real" benchmark. In the end, all you can do is test languages for a specific feature / purpose. You can see how many different suggestions people have here, and here (I think) you can see the difficulties of comparing languages. That site uses quite a lot of algorithms / problems with multiple inputs, single and multithreaded, with different optimization flags (where applicable) and so on paired with different languages, and it's a mess. Sometimes one language is on top, sometimes another. (I mean, python will very rarely beat pure C, but I wont rule out that someone already created an edge case just to refute exactly this point)
- how to benchmark a programming language
- The original computer languages benchmark is back
-
Comparing Elixir with Rust and Go
Hello, World!: Elixir vs. Go vs. Rust
Programming-Language-Benchmark
- Rust vs Zig Benchmarks
-
Ask HN: What are some of the most elegant codebases in your favorite language?
I found Zig implementation of json parsing is interesting. The code is free from hidden control flow !.
https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark...
-
Nim vs Rust Benchmarks
It appears helloworld is the only test with any repeats, and it only has 5 repeats. https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark...
Here's the measurement code, it appears to be significantly more complicated than a simple fork/exec/wait loop but that could just be all the C# getting in the way: https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark... Nevertheless you are probably right that the bulk of this 1.8ms is in the executable under test, and it truly is just bloat. Running `hyperfine ./empty-main-function` from rustc on my Mac gives 0.8ms.
-
Which programming language or compiler is faster
Is faster... on code that has been optimized to hell and back 5 times over and no longer resembles anything like normal code written in the language.
Seriously, this is the code for the top program. I'm reasonably sure 99% of C++ programmers could not decipher it without spending significant amounts of time on google: https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark...
I appreciate that fair benchmarks across languages are a hard problem, but this is not a good solution to it. Any reference to this data as a comparison between "programming languages and compilers" needs to come with a giant disclaimer that it's comparing them at something you almost certainly don't use them for, and is very far from their main use case.
I also appreciate that this is a repetitive comment the likes of which always come up when this benchmark is mentioned... but I really don't see another way to avoid people misinterpreting it. Very few people are going to spontaneously click through to the code.
What are some alternatives?
svix-webhooks - The enterprise-ready webhooks service 🦀
rosettaboy - A gameboy emulator in several different languages
rust-csharp-ffi - An example Rust + C# hybrid application
matrixmultiply - General matrix multiplication of f32 and f64 matrices in Rust. Supports matrices with general strides.
Game-Of-Life-Implementations - Conway's Game of Life implementation in various languages
cosmopolitan - build-once run-anywhere c library
sb-simd - A convenient SIMD interface for SBCL.
awesome-python-typing - Collection of awesome Python types, stubs, plugins, and tools to work with them.
lish - Lisp Shell
weave - A state-of-the-art multithreading runtime: message-passing based, fast, scalable, ultra-low overhead
CSharpWasmBenchmark - Comparing the performances of C# Runtime, C# Wasm AOT, C# Wasm Interpreted and JavaScript.
desktop - Focus on what matters instead of fighting with Git.