ObjectFiller.NET
The .NET ObjectFiller fills the properties of your .NET objects with random data (by Tynamix)
Bogus
:card_index: A simple fake data generator for C#, F#, and VB.NET. Based on and ported from the famed faker.js. (by bchavez)
Our great sponsors
| ObjectFiller.NET | Bogus | |
|---|---|---|
| - | 27 | |
| 76 | 8,261 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 8.3 | |
| 5 months ago | 2 days ago | |
| C# | C# | |
| MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ObjectFiller.NET
Posts with mentions or reviews of ObjectFiller.NET.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
We haven't tracked posts mentioning ObjectFiller.NET yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
Bogus
Posts with mentions or reviews of Bogus.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-01-06.
-
Bogus custom Dataset
Bogus NuGet package is fake data generator which can be helpful for populating tables in a database and testing purposes. If a database is not used and Bogus populates list of data each time an application runs, the data is random, never the same. Also, the random data generated by Bogus may not meet a developer’s requirements.
-
C# User-defined explicit and implicit conversion operators
A list is populated with NuGet package Bogus.
-
Windows form move items up/down in ListView and more
Other project either mocked data using NuGet package Bogus or a json file.
-
Should I give a copy of the database to the developer
That reminds me of Bogus which also generates dummy data that I've been using for sometime now.
-
Best practices for organising Mock Data & Repositories in Testing
To do all this you need test though...and that's where ]Bogus](https://github.com/bchavez/Bogus) and Auto Bogus come in handy. They both generate semi random test data that you can use to populate whatever method you've decided to use. You can setup rules so for specific fields, they have built in generators for common things like names and addresses. Auto Bogus can be used to populate large/complicated objects with data automatically (it can be slow if you don't use .WithRecursiveDepth() or.WithTreeDepth() )
-
Do you guys mock everything in your Unit Tests?
Bogus - For creating fake data Verify - Snapshot testing for .NET MELT - For testing ILogger usage Stryker - Mutation Testing for .NET TestContainers - run docker programmatically in integration tests
-
WinForms communicate between forms
To keep things interesting Bogus library is used to create a Person instance.
- bchavez/Bogus: fake data generator for C#
-
The art of Deconstructing
Usage with mocked data using Bogus NuGet package.
-
Nuget Packages in Class Libraries
I would say the issue is either a general issue with how Revit loads the addin, or maybe an issue with conflicts in your transitive dependencies. You can do some tests to try to figure out which. Try making a barebones Revit addin that uses a library that has no dependencies and isn't likely to be used in Revit. I'd suggest Bogus, you can use it generate a few pieces of test data and log them/display in the UI/whatever. If that works, then it would appear that Revit is fine with your addin having dependencies (which I would expect).