Nuget Package Manager VS Umbraco

- https://github.com/NuGet/Home/issues/8843

GitHub Issue

Similar issue here: https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/issues/28971. Following the breadcrumbs it looks like it may be a NuGet issue, reported here: https://github.com/NuGet/Home/issues/12227

Your issue appears to be related to not having the appropriate permissions to the Nuget folder (so says the error). There is an existing Bug/Ticket open on the Nuget github for this exact issue. There are a few solutions and/or workarounds listed through the conversation that you can try: https://github.com/NuGet/Home/issues/12162. Unfortunately I do not have a Mac to validate the solutions or the issue myself.

sounds like ur terminal has no internet connection here is a setup for configuring a proxy

The NuGet team is actively working on adding support for CPVM in .NET SDK 7.0.100/VS 17.4. There was a spec for the initial work that you can read at NuGet/Home, and they're looking to polish up and incorporate that work soon.

How do you currently feel about attaching the experience to install or when restoring packages? Various ecosystems do this and some get flak for it because of how many transitive dependencies and known vulnerabilities in comparison to others. I'm mostly curious because I'm working on a similar proposal here:

https://github.com/NuGet/Home/pull/11549

There's definitely a fine balance of noise, but how do you feel about it?

Nowadays, especially for any Umbraco extensions I develop, I try to follow Umbraco's own namespaces as closely as possible. e.g. I'd put my custom IContentFinder classes under a [Brand].Web.Routing namespace. Mostly so that it feels logical for any other developers who may be familiar with Umbraco core code.

🔴 Umbraco-CMS: The simple, flexible, and friendly ASP.NET CMS used by more than 730.000 websites.

Umbraco

Umbraco - for .NET devs

I discovered that I could recreate the behaviour manually if I deleted the TEMP index files. For about 1 minute I got 0 results, but then it fixed itself. Using the debugger, I discovered the ExamineIndexRebuilder class and the RebuildOnStartupHandler. As it turns out, these are the key classes that handle index initialisation. There were a few changes that I had to make in order to get my integration tests to work:

As /u/transhumanist2000 said, the only other one I've seen that looked heavily supported and had a sizable following are dot net nuke, and I'd add, Umbraco (https://umbraco.com/). Unfortunately I haven't heard the best of feedback about these cmses.

I really like Umbraco (https://umbraco.com/), It has a decent community, and is on DotNetCore these days makes it very easy to use. You can setup most basic things yourself, but since it exists as a satellite to your site. You can integrate with it as deeply or not as you want. Plus the workflow for defining content is nice, the customer-facing UI is also slick, and adding custom elements to it and extending is easy too. Plus it's free.

This is an extension for Umbraco (version 9+) that lets you use your Umbraco content in a headless fashion. It is highly customizable, and you can tweak or replace every aspect of the generated output.

This week I became Umbraco HQ's Director of Developer Relations. We're not known for sensible job titles but I wanted to let you know that this call was, in fact, mine.

Note: While testing and writing this post I found an issue with nodes having a listview, so if that isn't really working as expected. See the issue here.