Nimble VS Quick

Compare Nimble vs Quick and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • Appwrite - The Open Source Firebase alternative introduces iOS support
  • talent.io - Download talent.io’s Tech Salary Report
  • SonarLint - Clean code begins in your IDE with SonarLint
  • InfluxDB - Build time-series-based applications quickly and at scale.
  • Scout APM - Truly a developer’s best friend
Nimble Quick
0 3
4,528 9,530
0.4% 0.2%
6.4 7.9
3 days ago 2 days ago
Swift Swift
Apache License 2.0 Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Nimble

Posts with mentions or reviews of Nimble. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning Nimble yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

Quick

Posts with mentions or reviews of Quick. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-02-28.
  • Mobile e2e tests using WebdriverIO and Appium
    5 projects | dev.to | 28 Feb 2021
    These tests are responsible for validating that a single unit is working properly. You can think of a unit as a class or function. These tests are written in an isolated fashion. I mean, if the rest of the system is full of bugs and nothing else work, if this unit work, the test will pass. They are also repeatable. They don't depend on anything else, really. Anytime you run the test, if the code hasn't changed, the test will report the same result. These tests are intimately related to the code quality of your project. If your code is clean, these tests should be relatively easy to write. When writing unit tests in iOS, you usually use XCTest or Quick

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Nimble and Quick you can also consider the following projects:

OHHTTPStubs - Stub your network requests easily! Test your apps with fake network data and custom response time, response code and headers!

SwiftyMocky - Framework for automatic mock generation. Adds a set of handy methods, simplifying testing. One of the best and most complete solutions, including generics support and much more.

Kiwi - Simple BDD for iOS

Mockingbird - A Swifty mocking framework for Swift and Objective-C.

Sleipnir - BDD-style framework for Swift

Mockingjay - An elegant library for stubbing HTTP requests with ease in Swift

Cuckoo - Boilerplate-free mocking framework for Swift!

swift-corelibs-xctest - The XCTest Project, A Swift core library for providing unit test support

SwiftCheck - QuickCheck for Swift