conductor VS alibi-detect

We celebrated a remarkable milestone in September when the Netflix Conductor GitHub repository reached 10k stars. It was a momentous achievement for our DevRel team. Just a month later, we're thrilled to announce that we've surpassed 12k stars! ⭐🎉

Also, don’t forget to give us a ⭐ on our Netflix Conductor repo.

One of my favorite workflow engines that has a really simple way to do things was not listed here, so I'll call it out - Netflix Conductor (https://github.com/Netflix/conductor).

Its capabilities comes to light when you model really complex workflows and one real value is how its all very visual not just during modeling but when running it. The history remains visible and you can even see how the whole flow evolved.

Yet another significant milestone on our journey: we've proudly reached the 10,000-star mark on our Netflix Conductor GitHub repository! 🌟

Give something like https://github.com/Netflix/conductor a try to solve this -- makes it very easy to do what you are trying to achieve.

Checkout Conductor https://github.com/Netflix/conductor which is far more scalable and easy on the resources with its own Celery like queues. Fully supports writing task workers in python:

Numerous tools exist for detecting anomalies in time series data, but Alibi Detect stood out to me, particularly for its capabilities and its compatibility with both TensorFlow and PyTorch backends.

That is, to see whether a test image belongs in the distribution of the training images and to provide a routine for special cases. After a bit of reading Ive found that this is related to the field of drift detection in which I tried out alibi-detect . Whereby the training images are trained by an autoencoder and any subsequent drift will be flagged by the AE.

Wasserstein distance is not very suitable for drift detection on most problems given that the sample complexity (and estimation error) scales with O(n^(-1/d)) with n the number of instances (100k-10m in your case) and d the feature dimension (192 in your case). More interesting will be to use for instance a detector based on the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) with estimation error of O(n^(-1/2)). Notice the absence of the feature dimension here. You can find scalable implementations in Alibi Detect (disclosure: I am a contributor): MMD docs, image example. We just added the KeOps backend for the MMD detector to scale and speed up the drift detector further, so if you install from master, you can leverage this backend and easily scale the detector to 1mn instances on e.g. 1 RTX2080Ti GPU. Check this example for more info.

Seldon | Multiple positions | London/Cambridge UK | Onsite/Remote | Full time | seldon.io

At Seldon we are building industry leading solutions for deploying, monitoring, and explaining machine learning models. We are an open-core company with several successful open source projects like:

* https://github.com/SeldonIO/seldon-core

* https://github.com/SeldonIO/mlserver

* https://github.com/SeldonIO/alibi

* https://github.com/SeldonIO/alibi-detect

* https://github.com/SeldonIO/tempo

We are hiring for a range of positions, including software engineers(go, k8s), ml engineers (python, go), frontend engineers (js), UX designer, and product managers. All open positions can be found at https://www.seldon.io/careers/

I work in this area and also contribute to outlier/drift detection library https://github.com/SeldonIO/alibi-detect. To tackle this type of problem, I would strongly encourage following a more principled, fundamentally (statistically) sound approach. So for instance measuring metrics such as the KL-divergence (or many other f-divergences) will not be that informative since it has a lot of undesirable properties for the problem at hand (in order to be informative requires already overlapping distributions P and Q, it is asymmetric, not a real distance metric, will not scale well with data dimensionality etc). So you should probably look at Integral Probability Metrics (IPMs) such as the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) instead which have much nicer behaviour to monitor drift. I highly recommend the Interpretable Comparison of Distributions and Models NeurIPS workshop talks for more in-depth background.

All of the above functionality and more can be easily used under a simple API in https://github.com/SeldonIO/alibi-detect.