MudBlazor VS ASP.NET Core

I don't think that new Identity pages will work with MudBlazor out of the box. Take a look at this GitHub issue: https://github.com/MudBlazor/MudBlazor/issues/7805

The Blazor Server application uses the open source component MudBlazor, which I recommend to C# oriented developers. To keep the application simple, all data is stored in JSON files.

You could use Mudblazor and Codebeam Mud extensions.

Look up some Blazor UI / Component Libraries.Awesome-Blazor lists the more popular ones. The two I recommend are Mudblazor and Havit Blazor because the documentation is built using Blazor and the repos are open source on GitHub.

and you can use mudblazor components for free. https://mudblazor.com/

I'm creating a Blazor MAUI project using MudBlazor, and I'm looking for a way to refresh a page on Android using the pull to refresh feature. By now the best result I've found is to surround all the with a tag as shown here but this would mean refreshing the whole content on the page, NavMenu included. I've also tried to implement the BcdLib/PullComponent: with this one I can refresh only the body of the page but I can't achieve a smooth refresh animation like in the first method.

The load times and lighthouse score for the MUD Blazor site has put me off of Blazor entirely for anything public facing:

https://mudblazor.com/

This approach to organizing middleware enhances code readability, maintainability, and reusability. By following this encapsulation pattern, you're adhering to best practices in ASP.NET Core development, ensuring your application remains well-organized and scalable.

🌟.NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET 9 Preview 2 Discussion ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 Release Notes ➡️EF Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET Aspire preview 4 - .NET Aspire

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/50643

Even if you look at Microsoft’s by far most popular GitHub project, they’re still only half as big as SupaBase. If you believe “the SupaBase story”, SupaBase grew and became twice as large as Microsoft in 3 years. Below is their likes over time if you’re curious, together with a couple of additional “too good to be true” Silicon Valley projects.

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/10117

To achieve these objectives, we will take inspiration from ASP.NET Core Identity's PasswordHasher class. It incorporates a concept of hash versioning, allowing only the number of iterations to be modified.

yes I watched several courses, may be aim not getting clearly. but i worked with asp.net which uses http call and firebase cloud function also which uses socket connection, for socket connection its makes sense to use observable bcoz there streams of data we can observe once the connection establish ,but for http it need to be call every time.

As I'm not utilizing ASP.NET, despite its resource-intensive nature and occasional unpredictability, I prefer the cost-free option. I'm hesitant to invest in EPPlus or engage in trials, and moreover, I am more proficient with Interop. Given the limited volume of records in my department, there's a preference for utilizing tools covered by our existing license. This avoids the need for navigating through layers of approval within the chain of command and ensures compliance with our contractual agreements and Microsoft's patch management, ultimately aligning with a cost-saving mindset.