zephyr
Tree shaking breeze for PureScript CoreFn AST (by MaybeJustJames)
spago
🍝 PureScript package manager and build tool (by purescript)
Our great sponsors
| zephyr | spago | |
|---|---|---|
| - | 2 | |
| 157 | 762 | |
| - | 1.7% | |
| 2.6 | 9.0 | |
| about 1 year ago | 6 days ago | |
| Haskell | PureScript | |
| Mozilla Public License 2.0 | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
zephyr
Posts with mentions or reviews of zephyr.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
We haven't tracked posts mentioning zephyr yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
spago
Posts with mentions or reviews of spago.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-01-24.
-
How is the correct instance being selected here? Why is there no problem with ambiguity?
But then I'm also able to spago build my project and I get "[info] Build succeeded." (though it does complain I'm missing some dependencies, but I think that's unrelated) and according to the spago readme, that command is "just a thin layer above the PureScript compiler command purs compile".
-
In Search of the Best Functional Programming Back-End: 2021 Update
The original draw here was that I’d get Haskell powers, but could utilize the same CICD pipelines for Node.js. However, even with the wonderful JavaScript FP community creating easier to use libraries, EXACT same problems as Haskell. Ajax is hard, and I can’t install packages using Spago because of SSL rewrites breaking the installer.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing zephyr and spago you can also consider the following projects:
onyx - Toolkit for converting and building songs for Rock Band, Guitar Hero, Clone Hero, and other similar rhythm games
package-sets - PureScript packages for Spago and Psc-Package
happy - The Happy parser generator for Haskell
purr - [wip] a programming environment for collaboration
lit - A modern tool for literate programming
cachix - Command line client for Nix binary cache hosting:
ghc-mod
dhall-to-cabal - Compile Dhall expressions to Cabal files
ghcid - Very low feature GHCi based IDE
elm-library-installer - Installs Elm libraries in corporate networks.
ihaskell - A Haskell kernel for the Jupyter project.
dhall-nix