MapWith VS flow

Compare MapWith vs flow and see what are their differences.

MapWith

mapWith: like fmap, but can "inject" additional arguments such as whether first (or last) element, etc. (by davjam)

flow

:droplet: Write more understandable Haskell. (by tfausak)
Our great sponsors
  • JetBrains - Developer Ecosystem Survey 2022
  • SonarLint - Deliver Cleaner and Safer Code - Right in Your IDE of Choice!
  • Scout APM - Less time debugging, more time building
MapWith flow
0 0
0 185
- -
0.0 0.0
almost 2 years ago 6 months ago
Haskell Haskell
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

MapWith

Posts with mentions or reviews of MapWith. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning MapWith yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

flow

Posts with mentions or reviews of flow. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning flow yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MapWith and flow you can also consider the following projects:

gitHUD - command-line HUD for your git repo

prelude-extras - Haskell 98 higher order versions of Haskell Prelude classes to facilitate polymorphic recursion and reduce UndecidableInstances

purescript-bundle-fast - A fast alternative to PureScript's `psc-bundle` to be used during development

overhang - Hang loose with your lambdas!

sec - Haskell semantic editor combinators