MapWith VS sec

Compare MapWith vs sec and see what are their differences.

MapWith

mapWith: like fmap, but can "inject" additional arguments such as whether first (or last) element, etc. (by davjam)

sec

Haskell semantic editor combinators (by urso)
Our great sponsors
  • Scout APM - Less time debugging, more time building
  • SonarQube - Static code analysis for 29 languages.
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
MapWith sec
0 0
0 5
- -
0.0 0.0
almost 2 years ago over 7 years ago
Haskell Haskell
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

MapWith

Posts with mentions or reviews of MapWith. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning MapWith yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

sec

Posts with mentions or reviews of sec. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning sec yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MapWith and sec you can also consider the following projects:

prelude-extras - Haskell 98 higher order versions of Haskell Prelude classes to facilitate polymorphic recursion and reduce UndecidableInstances

overhang - Hang loose with your lambdas!

flow - :droplet: Write more understandable Haskell.