Machine-Learning-Game-Ideas
CARLA
Our great sponsors
| Machine-Learning-Game-Ideas | CARLA | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 0 | 263 | |
| - | 0.4% | |
| 10.0 | 0.0 | |
| about 2 years ago | 7 months ago | |
| Python | Python | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Machine-Learning-Game-Ideas
We haven't tracked posts mentioning Machine-Learning-Game-Ideas yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
CARLA
-
[R] CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithms
Abstract: Counterfactual explanations provide means for prescriptive model explanations by suggesting actionable feature changes (e.g., increase income) that allow individuals to achieve favourable outcomes in the future (e.g., insurance approval). Choosing an appropriate method is a crucial aspect for meaningful counterfactual explanations. As documented in recent reviews, there exists a quickly growing literature with available methods. Yet, in the absence of widely available open–source implementations, the decision in favour of certain models is primarily based on what is readily available. Going forward – to guarantee meaningful comparisons across explanation methods – we present CARLA (Counterfactual And Recourse Library), a python library for benchmarking counterfactual explanation methods across both different data sets and different machine learning models. In summary, our work provides the following contributions: (i) an extensive benchmark of 11 popular counterfactual explanation methods, (ii) a benchmarking framework for research on future counterfactual explanation methods, and (iii) a standardized set of integrated evaluation measures and data sets for transparent and extensive comparisons of these methods. We have open sourced CARLA and our experimental results on GitHub, making them available as competitive baselines. We welcome contributions from other research groups and practitioners.
What are some alternatives?
carla - Open-source simulator for autonomous driving research.
shapash - 🔅 Shapash: User-friendly Explainability and Interpretability to Develop Reliable and Transparent Machine Learning Models
rliable - [NeurIPS'21 Outstanding Paper] Library for reliable evaluation on RL and ML benchmarks, even with only a handful of seeds.
alibi - Algorithms for explaining machine learning models
pytorch-lightning - Build high-performance AI models with PyTorch Lightning (organized PyTorch). Deploy models with Lightning Apps (organized Python to build end-to-end ML systems). [Moved to: https://github.com/Lightning-AI/lightning]
DiCE - Generate Diverse Counterfactual Explanations for any machine learning model.
sagemaker-explaining-credit-decisions - Amazon SageMaker Solution for explaining credit decisions.
causallift - CausalLift: Python package for causality-based Uplift Modeling in real-world business
responsible-ai-toolbox - Responsible AI Toolbox is a suite of tools providing model and data exploration and assessment user interfaces and libraries that enable a better understanding of AI systems. These interfaces and libraries empower developers and stakeholders of AI systems to develop and monitor AI more responsibly, and take better data-driven actions.
Stanza - Stanford NLP Python library for tokenization, sentence segmentation, NER, and parsing of many human languages
pybench - Python benchmark tool inspired by Geekbench.
deepNOID - deepNOID, the binary music genre classifier which determines if what you're listening to really is NOIDED