LibClang
Haskell FFI to libclang (by chetant)
Obsidian
Obsidian Language Repository (by svenssonjoel)
Our great sponsors
| LibClang | Obsidian | |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | |
| 58 | 40 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| almost 7 years ago | almost 6 years ago | |
| Haskell | Haskell | |
| BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
LibClang
Posts with mentions or reviews of LibClang.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
We haven't tracked posts mentioning LibClang yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
Obsidian
Posts with mentions or reviews of Obsidian.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-06.
-
Is there any hard evidence that functional programming is better?
It got them 11 votes up. I asked to actually make this argument and received -4. Both sides of the claim are false, the left witnessed by things like Copilot and Obsidian, the right by the criticism of the functional style by Jon Harrop. If this is what you mean by «that is the point most of the comments tried to make» then, well, they should try harder if intellectual honesty and integrity are sought at all.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing LibClang and Obsidian you can also consider the following projects:
copilot - A stream-based runtime-verification framework for generating hard real-time C code.
really-simple-xml-parser - A really simple xml parser in Haskell using Parsec
toml-parser - Haskell parser and printer for the TOML 1.0.0 file format
resin - Resin: high performance variable binder and ast manipulation lib
language-fortran - Haskell parser and manipulation functions for Fortran code
hfmt - Format Haskell programs. Inspired by the gofmt utility.
bash
language-thrift - Haskell parser for the Thrift IDL format.
alga
lens-toml-parser - Lenses for toml-parser
why3 - Haskell support for the Why3 input format