LibAFL VS sharpfuzz

Compare LibAFL vs sharpfuzz and see what are their differences.

LibAFL

Advanced Fuzzing Library - Slot your Fuzzer together in Rust! Scales across cores and machines. For Windows, Android, MacOS, Linux, no_std, ... (by AFLplusplus)
Afl afl-fuzz aflplusplus Fuzzing coverage-guided binary-only Frida Rust libafl
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

sharpfuzz

AFL-based fuzz testing for .NET (by Metalnem)
Fuzzing Testing fuzz-testing Fuzzer Afl afl-fuzz libfuzzer
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
LibAFL sharpfuzz
4 1
1,838 349
3.3% -
9.7 6.5
5 days ago about 2 months ago
Rust C#
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

LibAFL

Posts with mentions or reviews of LibAFL. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-07-20.

sharpfuzz

Posts with mentions or reviews of sharpfuzz. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-06-16.
  • When do you consider your unit tests be "enough"?
    4 projects | /r/dotnet | 16 Jun 2021
    Because of the above I've generally been using tools like Stryker.NET and FsCheck to augment my testing suite. I'm still doing unit testing to find the more obvious "I haven't had my coffee, let's make sure I'm doing what I think I'm doing" bugs. I'm just using things like mutation testing, property testing, fuzzing, etc. to find the deeper issues in my code. There's a ton of libraries out there, including one that I've built for myself to help with testing but FsCheck and Stryker are just beautiful. And if you're interested in fuzzing, SharpFuzz is a great option. But that one isn't quite as easy of an on ramp compared to the other two that I mentioned.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LibAFL and sharpfuzz you can also consider the following projects:

AFLplusplus - The fuzzer afl++ is afl with community patches, qemu 5.1 upgrade, collision-free coverage, enhanced laf-intel & redqueen, AFLfast++ power schedules, MOpt mutators, unicorn_mode, and a lot more!

Stryker.NET - Mutation testing for .NET core and .NET framework!

frida-fuzzer - This experimetal fuzzer is meant to be used for API in-memory fuzzing.

FsCheck - Random Testing for .NET

cargo-fuzz - Command line helpers for fuzzing

e9afl - AFL binary instrumentation

libfuzzer - Rust bindings and utilities for LLVM’s libFuzzer

StdFuzzer - StdFuzzer is the reference implementation of a generic bit-level fuzzer with LibAFL

wtf - wtf is a distributed, code-coverage guided, customizable, cross-platform snapshot-based fuzzer designed for attacking user and / or kernel-mode targets running on Microsoft Windows and Linux user-mode (experimental!).

afl.rs - 🐇 Fuzzing Rust code with American Fuzzy Lop

Fuzzing101 - An step by step fuzzing tutorial. A GitHub Security Lab initiative

LibAFL vs AFLplusplus sharpfuzz vs Stryker.NET LibAFL vs frida-fuzzer sharpfuzz vs FsCheck LibAFL vs cargo-fuzz sharpfuzz vs AFLplusplus LibAFL vs e9afl sharpfuzz vs libfuzzer LibAFL vs StdFuzzer sharpfuzz vs wtf LibAFL vs afl.rs sharpfuzz vs Fuzzing101