JUCE VS Boost

Personally, I started by writing externals for Pure Data, then started to contribute to the care. Later I took the same path for SuperCollider.

The more typical path, I guess, would be to start with simple audio plugins. Have a look at JUCE (https://juce.com/)!

Realtime audio programming has some rather strict requirements that you don't have in most other software. Check out this classic article: http://www.rossbencina.com/code/real-time-audio-programming-...

Check out https://juce.com in the meantime

You can definitely start putting C++ into your embedded projects, and get familiar with things in an environment in which you're already operating. A lot of great C++ code can be found with motivated use of, for example, the platformio tooling, such that you can see for yourself some existing C++ In Embedded scenarios.

In general, also, I have found that it is wise to learn C++ socially - i.e. participate in Open Source projects, as you learn/study/contribute/assist other C++ developers, on a semi-regular basis.

I've learned a lot about what I would call "decent C++ code" (i.e. shipping to tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of customers) from such projects. I would suggest finding an open source C++ project, aligned with your interests, and study the codebase - as well as the repo history (i.e. gource) - to get a productive, relatively effortless (if the interests align) boost into the subject.

(My particular favourite project is the JUCE Audio library: https://juce.com/ .. one of many hundreds of great projects out there from which one can also glean modern C++ practices..)

Respect for the others here who recommend C but I think they’re possibly masochists. If anything JUCE, which uses C++ is in my opinion far more approachable.

Here's a link to their website: https://juce.com/

It seems like most audio plug-ins are built in C++ inside an audio coding program called JUCE, so maybe if I could open up the exisiting code inside that and then output it as an AU instead of a VST that could work.

C++ has https://juce.com/, I think.

Open source rule https://juce.com/

git clone https://github.com/boostorg/boost.git -b ${{ inputs.branch }} "${{ inputs.boost-dir }}" --depth 1 git submodule update --depth 1 -q --init tools/boostdep python tools/boostdep/depinst/depinst.py --include library_i_want"

Any thoughts on why it has exactly the same name as a popular source available project that's been around since the 1990s?

earliest archive: https://web.archive.org/web/19991011120524/http://www.boost....

latest commit (today): https://github.com/boostorg/boost/commit/7727baea944c6365301...

naming in 2023: "The Boost project provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries"

naming in 1999: "The Boost web site provides a repository for free C++ libraries"

Hmm...

include(FetchContent) FetchContent_Declare(boost URL https://github.com/boostorg/boost/releases/download/boost-1.81.0/boost-1.81.0.tar.xz ) FetchContent_MakeAvailable(boost) ...

set(BOOST_INCLUDE_LIBRARIES system thread) # enabled libraries set(BOOST_ENABLE_CMAKE ON) # CMake support FetchContent_Declare(boost GIT_REPOSITORY https://github.com/boostorg/boost.git ...

In fact, boost has cmake files now — pretty recent addition and I haven’t got around to testing, but no reason to think it doesn’t work. https://github.com/boostorg/boost. Also, boost is getting more modular with every release — more and more libraries can be pulled independently with mostly only depending on boost.core. Asio has been like this forever, but Boost.math is a recent example to the bandwagon. You can find an independent release package for math on GitHub now.

Do you build boost from sources? If so, maybe get the tar balls from their Github repository?