Haskell-breaking-changes VS foundation

Compare Haskell-breaking-changes vs foundation and see what are their differences.

foundation

☁️♮🏛 This repo contains several documents related to the operation of the CNCF. File non-technical issues related to CNCF here. (by cncf)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Haskell-breaking-changes foundation
3 11
88 522
- 1.1%
0.0 9.3
over 2 years ago 5 days ago
Rich Text Format
- GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Haskell-breaking-changes

Posts with mentions or reviews of Haskell-breaking-changes. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-13.

foundation

Posts with mentions or reviews of foundation. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-08-25.
  • Ask HN: Canonical Dicussions for OSS Projects?
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Sep 2023
    A mature open source project may be governed under an open source foundation which usually gives it a charter https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/main/charter.md#3-va...

    ... and/or set of values: https://kubernetes.io/community/values/

    There's also a lot of open source guides here https://todogroup.org/resources/guides/ that may help you if you're looking at building mature open source projects.

  • OpenTF Announces Fork of Terraform
    28 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Aug 2023
    The CNCF has made exceptions on their license policy before, specifically for MPL based software. It'll probably be easier for OpenTF to go through that process than to relicense (which is likely not even possible for anyone other than Hashicorp).

    - https://github.com/cncf/foundation/tree/main/license-excepti...

    - https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/main/license-excepti...

  • ebpf 月报 - 2023 年 1 月
    2 projects | dev.to | 26 Jan 2023
  • Cubernetes
    1 project | /r/kubernetes | 8 Jul 2022
    Your comment or post were removed for violating the CNCF Code of Conduct. Please take a moment to review that here: https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/code-of-conduct.md
  • A call to the open source community for help!
    2 projects | /r/opensource | 21 Nov 2021
    His behavior offends me as a professional software engineer and/ in my opinion, violates CNCF Code of Conduct https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/code-of-conduct.md.
  • Is Cloud Native meaningless jargon?
    3 projects | /r/devops | 13 Oct 2021
    Anyone can become a member. Non-profit as in https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/charter.md
  • Cloud Native design
    1 project | dev.to | 7 Jun 2021
    Read more about role of the CNCF, their projects and Values here.
  • CNCF: Third Party Dependencies that have been Relicensed to AGPL
    1 project | /r/devopsish | 11 May 2021
  • Minio Changes License to AGPL
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Apr 2021
    https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/allowed-third...

    I haven't read the details, or ever seen this policy before (I'm new to both projects) but it was summarized by one of our counterparts at the Linux Foundation here:

    https://twitter.com/cra/status/1384859663615864833

    Tl;dr: licenses must be approved for use, and the CNCF has this list of allowed licenses, AGPL is not on it. The CNCF is in the business of distributing permissively-licensed software is the short version I guess. I don't understand, I don't work on the legal side, I am a dev and I support end users.

    It seems if your Apache 2.0 licensed project needs to modify and distribute as modified Grafana, which it seems likely we will need to do at some point, then you cannot distribute them together. Chris says they are going to work something out, but when a component has made a decision to re-license with a restrictive-copyleft license such as AGPL, I don't know what there is that can be done.

    Maybe the CNCF adopts AGPL too, (which would mean that then all those "viral-GPL" FUD-spreaders will have been right...) that seems counter-productive if that is the outcome.

  • Can you recommend some resources for learning about security practices I should know about when approaching an app conversion to kubes from VM based deploys please?
    1 project | /r/kubernetes | 3 Feb 2021
    Your comment or post were removed for violating the CNCF Code of Conduct. Please take a moment to review that here: https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/code-of-conduct.md

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Haskell-breaking-changes and foundation you can also consider the following projects:

foundation - Empire strikes back

netboot.xyz - Your favorite operating systems in one place. A network-based bootable operating system installer based on iPXE.

streaming-commons - Common lower-level functions needed by various streaming data libraries

PIVX - Protected Instant Verified Transactions - Core wallet.

aeson - A fast Haskell JSON library

minio - The Object Store for AI Data Infrastructure

cryptonite - lowlevel set of cryptographic primitives for haskell

autocert - [mirror] Go supplementary cryptography libraries

wai-conduit - Haskell Web Application Interface

dash - Dash - Reinventing Cryptocurrency

iproute - IP Routing Table in Haskell

toc - ⚖️ The CNCF Technical Oversight Committee (TOC) is the technical governing body of the CNCF Foundation.