FreeRTOS-Kernel VS mongoose-os

Here is the port - https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/tree/main/portable/ThirdParty/GCC/Posix

Freertos has support for generic cortex m3: https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/tree/main/portable/GCC/ARM_CM3 It could very well work almost out of the box with your mcu.

the only OS written in iso c i found was RTOS and they have open bug reports due to strict aliasing in simple things like their linked list implementation, which they don't bother to fix because somehow that causes even more problems (?!): https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/54

You likely put the requirements of POSIX just to have an excuse. Fyi, FreeRTOS kernel, the only thing you need, is here: https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/

- https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel (architecture, C)

FreeRTOS comes with 5 quite simple reference implementations of the heap memory allocator. You can study how it works.

The main branch is single-core. You're looking for the SMP branch.

On non-POSIX systems, malloc & free are implemented differently. EG FreeRTOS has some very simple malloc (and optionally free) implementations, eg heap_2.c (has malloc & free, but doesn't consolidate blocks), or heap_4.c (more complex, tries to prevent fragmentation by consolidating blocks, still less optmized & simpler than the glibc malloc/free used by most Linux systems).

As long as Toit is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1, I am unlikely to consider using it. By contrast, MicroPython is licensed under the MIT License (MIT).

As others have noted, Toit seems like a bad name. I suppose non-French speakers will tend to inadvertently mispronounce Toit.

Getting traction is hard. In my opinion, having a restrictive license and a bad name make it less likely Toit will gain traction. Finally, Toit licensing reminds me of Mongoose OS https://github.com/cesanta/mongoose-os#mongoose-os---an-iot-....

Cesanta Software mongooses – Update available