FluidFramework VS Scrutor

Have you seen FluidFramework? It's open source (MIT): https://github.com/microsoft/FluidFramework

I think the first product they're building on it is Loop: https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-introduces-loop-a-ne...

Full disclosure I work at MSFT and on the fluid framework.

If you are interested in this you may also be interested in the fluid framework, https://github.com/microsoft/FluidFramework

We use websockets and solve a lot of the state management problem called out here by keeping very little state on the server itself. The primary thing on server is a monotonically increasing integer we use to stamp messages, this gives us total order broadcast which we then build upon: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_broadcast

Here are some code pointers if you want to take a look:

The map package is a decent place to look for how we leverage total order broadcast to keep clients in sync in our distributed data structures:

(Disclosure: Work at Microsoft, but I work in Azure and some open source stuff, not on or directly with Fluid/Office/etc.)

That's just a trademark clause for Microsoft logos and brands. The Fluid Framework itself is [MIT licensed](https://github.com/microsoft/FluidFramework/blob/main/LICENS...) and doesn't require exposing any of those logos/brands when you use it, so the framework itself is fairly open for usage.

I think the main thing that would slow down adoption for Fluid is that the only "production" backend is an Azure service, which isn't part of the open source Fluid Framework. [Other open source backends](https://fluidframework.com/docs/deployment/service-options/) aren't recommended for productions. Until there are some open source ones, I'd assume adoption will be limited to folks in the Azure ecosystem.

Within the context of the Microsoft-verse, Fluid Framework (https://fluidframework.com) is supposed to be solving similar problems in web apps, although I haven't personally played with it.

Microsoft recently open sourced fluid framework. It is a distributed, consensus based, real time collaboration framework written in typescript. Fluid would keep your clients synced up and your server code would only have to handle when someone hits submit. Fluid Framework

The official documentation and the github repository seem clear.

You can with MS's default DI as well via scrutor.

if you are heavily invested in autofac you can replace the build in DI with another container. at this point i don't think it is that necessary. especially if you use scrutor. it gives your some nice assembly scanning registration that autofac/simple injector give https://github.com/khellang/Scrutor

If you wouldn't mind, I have one additional question. If I wouldn't bother to remove this loading, how could one add that as service when using DI? I have found tool called Scrutor (https://github.com/khellang/Scrutor), is it something commonly used in situation like this?

I much prefer using Scrutor and asbly scanning myself. https://github.com/khellang/Scrutor

you can also use Scrutor to get closer to Autofac functionality https://github.com/khellang/Scrutor

That can't be the only justification, because you can easily register services using reflection without using MediatR.

I might suggest additional registration time extensions to modify the behavior as needed on classes. Take a look at Scrutor for some inspiration on API specifically.

There is a package that simplifies it for you if you want. But not everybody agrees that automatic registration is good pattern, so you have a choice.