Fluent.Ribbon VS MUI

Compare Fluent.Ribbon vs MUI and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Fluent.Ribbon MUI
1 2
2,431 4,513
1.6% 0.0%
8.4 0.0
15 days ago over 2 years ago
C# JavaScript
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Fluent.Ribbon

Posts with mentions or reviews of Fluent.Ribbon. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

MUI

Posts with mentions or reviews of MUI. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-01-23.
  • Top Material Design 3 web frameworks of 2024
    4 projects | dev.to | 23 Jan 2024
    👉 https://www.muicss.com
  • What UI frameworks other than MUI would you recommend for professional / enterprise React projects using Material Design?
    4 projects | /r/Frontend | 4 Jul 2022
    I mean, Material is just a design system that people reference to create UI libraries. If you're working with headless components, you'd keep those same design system references when writing styles for said components. Plenty of examples of people utilizing something like Tailwind and following Material guidelines, ex Material Tailwind, Smelte, or MUICSS. Would highly recommend going the manual route (custom css/less/scss or tailwind, etc) + headless UI as it's really effective at reducing bloat in your application, and if you do it right it's extraordinarily extensible and customizable compared to just full sending an existing lib.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fluent.Ribbon and MUI you can also consider the following projects:

Avalonia - Develop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The most popular .NET Foundation community project.

material-design-for-bootstrap - Important! A new UI Kit version for Bootstrap 5 is available. Access the latest free version via the link below.

MahApps.Metro - A framework that allows developers to cobble together a better UI for their own WPF applications with minimal effort.

React-Landing-Page-Template - A simple react one page landing page templates for startups/companies

Xamarin.Forms - Xamarin.Forms Official Home

primereact - The Most Complete React UI Component Library

metroframework-modern-ui - My humble attempt to bring the new Modern UI alias Metro UI of Windows 8 to .NET Windows Forms applications.

Materialize - Materialize, a CSS Framework based on Material Design

UWP Community Toolkit - The Windows Community Toolkit is a collection of helpers, extensions, and custom controls. It simplifies and demonstrates common developer tasks building .NET apps with UWP and the Windows App SDK / WinUI 3 for Windows 10 and Windows 11. The toolkit is part of the .NET Foundation.

Bunifu UI Framework - Social App dark UI built with Bunifu UI Framework Ultimate Bundle

MaterialDesignInXamlToolkit - Google's Material Design in XAML & WPF, for C# & VB.Net.

Meteor JS - Meteor, the JavaScript App Platform