FaxJs
unocss
Our great sponsors
FaxJs | unocss | |
---|---|---|
6 | 56 | |
388 | 15,213 | |
- | 2.7% | |
0.0 | 9.6 | |
almost 3 years ago | 4 days ago | |
JavaScript | TypeScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
FaxJs
-
Is React Having An Angular.js Moment?
More accurately, Facebook engineer Jordan Walke created the small UI framework FaxJs, Facebook realized that a technology like this could solve their horrible mess of cascading DOM updates that made it near-impossible to make product improvements, and they soon turned it into React.
-
Maud: A Rust macro for writing HTML
That's actually the heritage of JSX!
XHP was launched in 2010 (https://www.facebook.com/notes/10158791323777200/)
The first version of FaxJs (the precursor to React) was launched in 2011, being directly inspired from XHP (https://github.com/jordwalke/FaxJs)
React was made in 2012 by the same person who made FaxJs, taking the best ideas from FaxJs and creating React.
So yeah, JSX actually comes from the idea of XHP :)
-
State of the Web: React
Around a decade ago, Facebook started looking for a way to modernize its web app. It was becoming increasingly complicated, and they needed a framework to make it easier to build and maintain. To fix this, they created a project called Bolt. Bolt was an MVC framework built on top of JavelinJS, and it solved many of the problems Facebook had. However, it was not perfect. Jordan Walke, a developer at Facebook, created the next iteration of Bolt, called FaxJS. It offered many features that React has today, like rendering on both client and server, DOM diffing, and more. Jordan Walke renamed FaxJS FBolt and started using it in Facebook's codebase.
-
Top JavaScript Trends to Watch in 2021
Source: FaxJs on GitHub
unocss
-
Tailwind CSS v4.0.0 Alpha
I wish tailwind would support attributify like https://github.com/unocss/unocss, which is much more readable for complex layouts:
link
-
Catalyst – Tailwind CSS Application UI Kit
I feel the same about people praising Tailwind.
Tailwind (and similar, I tend to use https://unocss.dev/) is not good for your frontend architecture BUT they allow you to be so fast, that it negates the benefits.
For a job well done, I'd follow the principles of https://maintainablecss.com/
-
~~New~~ Old way to write CSS
The most popular tools that implement this approach are: Tailwind, WindiCSS, UnoCSS.
-
Which is best for DX and efficiency, TailwindCSS, UnoCSS, PandaCSS, or the new MasterCSS
- UnoCSS: https://unocss.dev/
-
A design system for the federal government
haha, fair point. Still, I'm on the fence about how utility components are namespaced in USWDS. Perhaps giving users the flexibility to define the namespace might work better? One thing that bugs me is the absence of class-sorting like we have in TailwindCSS. Plus, there are some gaps I've noticed in USWDS. The naming, especially when comparing "padding-x-2" and "p-x-2", can be really annoying when switching around, maybe that could also be an option for the developer or project. Similar to the ideas antfu has on uno.css https://unocss.dev/ ♥
-
Modern CSS Framework or Library for Static Websites?
UnoCSS is a popular option
-
Vrite Editor: Open-Source WYSIWYG Markdown Editor
UnoCSS — for styling with Tailwind-like atomic CSS;
-
Why I Switched From Neovim to VSCode
Some exceptional libraries and frameworks only support VSCode, which you could argue is a bad thing, but it makes sense, VSCode is the most popular code editor after all. For example UnoCSS only has a VSCode extension, and it's my favourite way to write CSS. Astro has a LSP but I've found that the experience in VSCode is much better than in Neovim.
-
TailwindCSS vs. UnoCSS
I’m a long time TailwindCSS user and a huge fan of utility CSS in general. I’ve rarely felt a strong need to switch, but UnoCSS has been on my mind for a bit. I got around to using it properly, so I thought it’d be fun to write up my thoughts on both in detail.
-
Microframework CSS
What about a atomic CSS engine instead? UnoCSS
What are some alternatives?
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.
windicss - Next generation utility-first CSS framework.
tail-kit - Tail-kit is a free and open source components and templates kit fully coded with Tailwind css 3.0.
unplugin-vue-components - 📲 On-demand components auto importing for Vue
Quasar Framework - Quasar Framework - Build high-performance VueJS user interfaces in record time
vanilla-extract - Zero-runtime Stylesheets-in-TypeScript
pico - Minimal CSS Framework for semantic HTML
windicss-intellisense - Intelligent WindiCSS tooling for VS Code
styled-components - Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅
merakiui - Tailwind CSS components that support RTL languages & fully responsive based on Flexbox & CSS Grid with elegant Dark Mode 🚀 ☄️.
vite-plugin-vue-layouts - Vue layout plugin for Vite
vite-quasar-api - spring boot jpa