DifferentialEquations.jl
DiffEqOperators.jl
Our great sponsors
DifferentialEquations.jl | DiffEqOperators.jl | |
---|---|---|
6 | 3 | |
2,754 | 281 | |
1.5% | - | |
7.3 | 4.6 | |
17 days ago | 10 months ago | |
Julia | Julia | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
DifferentialEquations.jl
-
Startups are building with the Julia Programming Language
This lists some of its unique abilities:
https://docs.sciml.ai/DiffEqDocs/stable/
The routines are sufficiently generic, with regard to Julia’s type system, to allow the solvers to automatically compose with other packages and to seamlessly use types other than Numbers. For example, instead of handling just functions Number→Number, you can define your ODE in terms of quantities with physical dimensions, uncertainties, quaternions, etc., and it will just work (for example, propagating uncertainties correctly to the solution¹). Recent developments involve research into the automated selection of solution routines based on the properties of the ODE, something that seems really next-level to me.
[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/834571/
-
From Common Lisp to Julia
https://github.com/SciML/DifferentialEquations.jl/issues/786. As you could see from the tweet, it's now at 0.1 seconds. That has been within one year.
Also, if you take a look at a tutorial, say the tutorial video from 2018,
-
When is julia getting proper precompilation?
It's not faith, and it's not all from Julia itself. https://github.com/SciML/DifferentialEquations.jl/issues/785 should reduce compile times of what OP mentioned for example.
-
Julia 1.7 has been released
Let's even put raw numbers to it. DifferentialEquations.jl usage has seen compile times drop from 22 seconds to 3 seconds over the last few months.
https://github.com/SciML/DifferentialEquations.jl/issues/786
- Suggest me a Good library for scientific computing in Julia with good support for multi-core CPUs and GPUs.
-
DifferentialEquations compilation issue in Julia 1.6
https://github.com/SciML/DifferentialEquations.jl/issues/737 double posted, with the answer here. Please don't do that.
DiffEqOperators.jl
-
Julia 1.7 has been released
>I hope those benchmarks are coming in hot
M1 is extremely good for PDEs because of its large cache lines.
https://github.com/SciML/DiffEqOperators.jl/issues/407#issue...
The JuliaSIMD tools which are internally used for BLAS instead of OpenBLAS and MKL (because they tend to outperform standard BLAS's for the operations we use https://github.com/YingboMa/RecursiveFactorization.jl/pull/2...) also generate good code for M1, so that was giving us some powerful use cases right off the bat even before the heroics allowed C/Fortran compilers to fully work on M1.
-
Why are NonlinearSolve.jl and DiffEqOperators.jl incompatible with the latest versions of ModelingToolkit and Symbolics!!!? Symbolics and ModelingToolkit are heavily downgraded when those packages are added.
(b) DiffEqOperators.jl is being worked on https://github.com/SciML/DiffEqOperators.jl/pull/467 .
-
What's Bad about Julia?
I like that they are colored now, but really what needs to be added is type parameter collapasing. In most cases, you want to see `::Dual{...}`, i.e. "it's a dual number", not `::Dual{typeof(ODESolution{sfjeoisjfsfsjslikj},sfsef,sefs}` (these can literally get to 3000 characters long). As an example of this, see the stacktraces in something like https://github.com/SciML/DiffEqOperators.jl/issues/419 . The thing is that it gives back more type information than the strictest dispatch: no function is dispatching off of that first 3000 character type parameter, so you know that printing that chunk of information is actually not informative to any method decisions. Automated type abbreviations could take that heuristic and chop out a lot of the cruft.
What are some alternatives?
ModelingToolkit.jl - An acausal modeling framework for automatically parallelized scientific machine learning (SciML) in Julia. A computer algebra system for integrated symbolics for physics-informed machine learning and automated transformations of differential equations
Gridap.jl - Grid-based approximation of partial differential equations in Julia
diffeqpy - Solving differential equations in Python using DifferentialEquations.jl and the SciML Scientific Machine Learning organization
BoundaryValueDiffEq.jl - Boundary value problem (BVP) solvers for scientific machine learning (SciML)
ApproxFun.jl - Julia package for function approximation
FourierFlows.jl - Tools for building fast, hackable, pseudospectral partial differential equation solvers on periodic domains
DiffEqBase.jl - The lightweight Base library for shared types and functionality for defining differential equation and scientific machine learning (SciML) problems
julia - The Julia Programming Language
FFTW.jl - Julia bindings to the FFTW library for fast Fourier transforms
oxide-enzyme - Enzyme integration into Rust. Experimental, do not use.