CoreWCF VS runtimelab

Compare CoreWCF vs runtimelab and see what are their differences.

CoreWCF

Main repository for the Core WCF project (by CoreWCF)

runtimelab

This repo is for experimentation and exploring new ideas that may or may not make it into the main dotnet/runtime repo. (by dotnet)
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
CoreWCF runtimelab
24 57
1,663 1,445
0.6% 1.8%
8.4 3.5
16 days ago 1 day ago
C#
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

CoreWCF

Posts with mentions or reviews of CoreWCF. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-02-22.

runtimelab

Posts with mentions or reviews of runtimelab. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-08-22.
  • Async2 – The .NET Runtime Async experiment concludes
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 Aug 2024
    For everyone reading this blog post I caution that the conclusions there are at best creative interpretations of the notes written down here: https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/blob/feature/async2-exp...

    It is quite literally impossible to draw conclusions on e.g. memory consumption until the work on this, which is underway, makes it into mainline runtime. It's important to understand that the experiment was first and foremost a research to look into modernizing async implementation, and was a massive success. Now once that is proven, the tuned and polished implementation will be made.

    Once it is done and makes into a release (it could even be as early as .NET 10), then further review will be possible.

  • Java Virtual Threads: A Case Study
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 17 Jul 2024
    This FAQ is a bit outdated in places, and is not something most users should worry about in practice.

    JVM Green Threads here serve predominantly back-end scenarios, where most of the items on the list are not of concern. This list also exists to address bad habits that carried over from before the tasks were introduced, many years ago.

    In general, the perceived want of green threads is in part caused by misunderstanding of that one bad article about function coloring. And that one bad article about function coloring also does not talk about the way you do async in C#.

    Async/await in C# is just a better model with explicit understanding where a method returns an operation that promises to complete in the future or not, and composting tasks for easy (massive) concurrency is significantly more idiomatic than doing so with green threads or completable futures that existed in Java before these.

    Also one change to look for is "Runtime Handled Tasks" project in .NET that will replace Roslyn-generated state machine code with runtime-provided suspension mechanism which will only ever suspend at true suspension points where task's execution actually yields asynchronously. So far numbers show at least 5x decrease in overhead, which is massive and will bring performance of computation heavy async paths in line with sync ones: https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/blob/feature/async2-exp...

  • How to Use the Foreign Function API in Java 22 to Call C Libraries
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 8 May 2024
    Async/await is not a tight corner as showcased by a multitude of languages adopting the pattern: Rust, Python, JavaScript and Swift.

    In fact, it is a clean abstraction where future progress is possible while retaining the convenience of its concurrency syntax and task composition.

    Green threads experiment proved net negative in terms of benefit but its the follow-up work on modernizing the implementation detail was very successful: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/94620 / https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/blob/feature/async2-exp...

    It also seems that common practices in Java indicate that properties are not a mistake as showcased by popularity of Lombok and dozens of other libraries to generate builders and property-like methods (or, worse, Java developers having to write them by hand).

  • Green Thread Experiment in .NET
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 30 Apr 2024
  • Is .NET just miles ahead or am I delusional?
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 13 Apr 2024
    There was a "green thread" experiment for dotnet a while ago, here is the conclusion: https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398
  • Why choose async/await over threads?
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Mar 2024
    Experiment result write-up: https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/blob/e69dda51c7d796b812...

    TLDR: The green threads experiment was a failure as it found (expected and obvious) issues that the Java applications are now getting to enjoy, joining their Go colleagues, while also requiring breaking changes. It, however, gave inspiration to subsequent re-examination of current async/await implementation and whether it can be improved by moving state machine generation and execution away from IL completely to runtime. It was a massive success as evidenced by preliminary overhead estimations in the results.

  • Garnet – A new remote cache-store from Microsoft Research
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 18 Mar 2024
    Yeah, it kind of is. There are quite a few of experiments that are conducted to see if they show promise in the prototype form and then are taken further for proper integration if they do.

    Unfortunately, object stack allocation was not one of them even though DOTNET_JitObjectStackAllocation configuration knob exists today, enabling it makes zero impact as it almost never kicks in. By the end of the experiment[0], it was concluded that before investing effort in this kind of feature becomes profitable given how a lot of C# code is written, there are many other lower hanging fruits.

    To contrast this, in continuation to green threads experiment, a runtime handled tasks experiment[1] which moves async state machine handling from IL emitted by Roslyn to special-cased methods and then handling purely in runtime code has been a massive success and is now being worked on to be integrated in one of the future version of .NET (hopefully 10?)

    [0] https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/11192

    [1] https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/blob/feature/async2-exp...

  • Java virtual threads hit with pinning issue
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Feb 2024
    Unlike these folks from dotnet, which tested directly on ASP for real workload

      https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398?darkschemeovr=1
  • Ask HN: Do we have evidence that green threading is faster than OS threads?
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 2 Feb 2024
    [1] https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398
  • JEP Draft – Derived Record Creation (Preview) – Java
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 24 Jan 2024
    The only way to avoid it is to not build on top of Java or not adding any features on top of Java.

    > To give another example with C#, there has been a lot of recent discussion about finding potential alternatives to their async-await concurrency model. They cite the level of effort it takes to maintain the async await style code and the costs that come from this.

    I had a very different take-away. They did PoC with virtual threads and decided it's not worth the switch now and async-await that they have is good enough.

    https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab/issues/2398

    > Some of the languages it gets compared too aren't even that old yet.

    C# is old enough to drink and Scala just had its 20th birthday this week :)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CoreWCF and runtimelab you can also consider the following projects:

SoapCore - SOAP extension for ASP.NET Core

.NET Runtime - .NET is a cross-platform runtime for cloud, mobile, desktop, and IoT apps.

Introducing .NET Multi-platform App UI (MAUI) - .NET MAUI is the .NET Multi-platform App UI, a framework for building native device applications spanning mobile, tablet, and desktop.

DNNE - Prototype native exports for a .NET Assembly.

FrameworkBenchmarks - Source for the TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks project

csharplang - The official repo for the design of the C# programming language

dapr - Dapr is a portable, event-driven, runtime for building distributed applications across cloud and edge.

.NET-Obfuscator - Lists of .NET Obfuscator (Free, Freemium, Paid and Open Source )

wcf - This repo contains the client-oriented WCF libraries that enable applications built on .NET Core to communicate with WCF services.

zeebe-dapr-example - An example that allows to orchestrate Dapr microservices with the Zeebe process engine.

Cocona - Micro-framework for .NET console application. Cocona makes it easy and fast to build console applications on .NET.

CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured