Cloak VS ipt_xor

You can try cloak? It is meant to circumvent these types of bans.

Already saw this Cloak Underlying proxy configuration guides but could not understand how to do it with outline server.

does this might help you ? https://github.com/cbeuw/Cloak

>it's not clear that Cloak does anything novel when compared to existing systems.

I'm not an expert on censorship-circumvention utilities but I found this comment when browsing the Cloak source repository that may partially answer your question:

https://github.com/cbeuw/Cloak/issues/169#issuecomment-12574...

>, and how do you prevent the censoring regime from finding and blocking them?

The tools like Cloak try to work on the principle "collateral freedom" which hides censored data inside of "internet services that are too big block" : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collateral_freedom

And the effectiveness of that strategy depends on the hackability of those internet services as they can sometimes change the rules which close the loopholes of "collateral freedom" : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_fronting#Disabling

I recommend https://github.com/cbeuw/Cloak which is designed for this use case.

Not in Iran, and the following would be trivial to detect, but this xtables module may be of use. It runs entirely in-kernel, so if it works, it shouldn't cause much of a performance hit. Only try this if your only goal is bypassing censorship; it won't do a very good job at hiding the fact that you're using a VPN to a human observer.

obfuscate udp packet by XOR https://github.com/faicker/ipt_xor Being an iptables module, this one is very fast compare to udp2raw. The con is it doesn’t change the packet length, besides WG packet has a lots of zeros so the key used for XOR is easy to recognize. However, the ISP most likely use some kind of hardware implementation to detect fixed patterns. So this simple XOR may be enough for evading detection.