Bogus VS Fluent Assertions

Usage with mocked data using Bogus NuGet package.

Going forward, the secret to knowing were to find data is to read Bogus information in the readme file which goes into depth were to find paths to generate data. This is very important as you can clash with their classes e.g. you create a Person class and guess what, Bogus has a Person class. This is were knowing how to work with using statements and using statements with aliasing.

Code samples for Json.net which as of version 13.0.2 now supports DateOnly and TimeOnly. Three code samples are used to show interactions with Bogus and Microsoft.Data.SqlClient which is most likely used to work with json data.

In terms of generating test cases, I've come across this before: https://github.com/bchavez/Bogus

I used a .Net library a few years ago to create random text for a bunch of fake email bodies. It wasn't "lorem ipsum" type text, but full sentences and paragraphs. It would produce text that sounded like it came from a bullshit consulting handbook, or an intentionally obtuse technical description....things like, "Though vague in purpose the participant reality substituted reactional nature while in strongest thought vertices coincided with ...." and so on. I think it was somehow tied to Bogus but I can't seem to find it anywhere. Anyone able to help me out here?

Bogus Github Nuget: Install-Package Bogus -Version 33.1.1

Seems like a fun package but I prefer Bogus

I inserted 10M rows of fake data generated by Bogus into the table. You can download the dump here.

What is Bogus and Faker? They are libraries randomly to create a variety of dummy data such as human name, address, date and product/company name etc. = reduce our boring time of generating dummy records and have testing cases with multiple dummy values instead of our static ones.

FluentAssertions para Asserts muy flexibles y entendibles

https://www.nuget.org/packages/Newtonsoft.Json/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/AutoMapper/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/Dapper/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/FluentValidation/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/FluentAssertions/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/NUnit/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/xunit/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/YamlDotNet/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/Moq/ That is simply not true. Mature c# projects purposely maintain no downstream dependencies and is they do, it's to a major reputable lib. See for yourself - these are staple third party packages commonly used. Anything dependency starting with System or NETStandard is Microsoft maintained.

FluentAssertions is one of the most popular (over 66 million downloads on Nuget) .NET library that contains a large collection of .NET extension methods that allow .NET developers to write unit tests using a fluent syntax which is very easy to read and write and clearly shows the intent of the unit test. The library has extension methods to test almost everything related to .NET such as Strings, Booleans, Dates, Guids, Collections, Exceptions, and even Nullable Types. You can add this library to your unit test projects via Nuget package manager and start using this library in few minutes.

I love fluency. I myself work on a package for fluent programming. I recommend you using FluentAssertions for tests though. Nonetheless, keep working! Starred your repo.

For example, all tests below this line are written in Honk# + FluentAssertions (the latter is an example of a library which also provides a lot of fluent methods for xUnit to perform assertions). Soon I'll be moving more of its (AngouriMath's) code to this style, as long as it doesn't harm readability and performance.

fluentassertions / fluentassertions