BenchmarkDotNet
Bogus
Our great sponsors
BenchmarkDotNet | Bogus | |
---|---|---|
67 | 27 | |
9,990 | 8,208 | |
1.2% | - | |
9.3 | 8.3 | |
4 days ago | about 1 month ago | |
C# | C# | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
BenchmarkDotNet
-
Stop Guessing, Start Measuring: Transform Your Code with BenchmarkDotnet!
Let’s look at the first example you see, when you open up BenchmarkDotnet’s website, or Github page.
-
Benchmarking 20 programming languages on N-queens and matrix multiplication
Or use BenchmarkDotNet which, among other things to get an accurate benchmark, does JIT warmup outside of measurement.
-
How to improve C# performance on matrix multiplication example?
You can also do proper statistically correct benchmarking by using - https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet. This will run warmup the jit, gauge the overheads, and run your function many times to give you proper data.
-
C# Memory Profiler on VSCode
take a look at: https://benchmarkdotnet.org/
-
standard events vs MVVM Reference Messenger
Yes, weak references are slower than direct calls. How much slower? Heck if I know offhand. But it's usually pretty easy to set up something with Benchmark .NET and find out if it hurts your use case.
-
Mechanisms and Performance when querying data to SQLServer from C#
For this purpose we are going to use our beloved BenchmarkDotNet tool.
-
Object Mapping in .NET
To quantify and compare the performance of the object mapping strategies discussed earlier, we can employ BenchmarkDotNet.
-
Exploring Code Performance Testing in C# with BenchmarkDotNet
BenchmarkDotNet is a popular open-source library that, as stated in the repo's README.md, helps us to transform methods into benchmarks, track their performance, and share reproducible measurement experiments. Using BenchmarkDotNet feels similar to writing unit tests. It's very important to note that the library only works with console apps. Finally, we can visualize the results in the terminal where the benchmark ran or in user-friendly formats such as markdown, HTML and CSV. We will explore examples of there formats later in the article.
-
Is it okay to lock on a StringBuilder, on which StringBuilrer I perform some operations on?
However, obviously this prevents parallelism within the lock, so this only makes sense if you do some other expensive operation in the parallel loop and the string builder is only a small part of it. Performance wise, it may be better to concatenate the results together after the parallel operation, instead of locking inside the loop. You'll have to benchmark it to know for sure.
-
Iterator Benchmarks That Shocked With Unexpected Results!
We’re of course going to be using BenchmarkDotNet for our benchmarks, and you can find all of the code for these over at GitHub. To start, we need an entry point hook for our single Benchmark class that will be defining the permutations of scenarios that we’d like to run. This will be relatively basic as follows:
Bogus
-
Bogus custom Dataset
Bogus NuGet package is fake data generator which can be helpful for populating tables in a database and testing purposes. If a database is not used and Bogus populates list of data each time an application runs, the data is random, never the same. Also, the random data generated by Bogus may not meet a developer’s requirements.
-
C# User-defined explicit and implicit conversion operators
A list is populated with NuGet package Bogus.
-
Windows form move items up/down in ListView and more
Other project either mocked data using NuGet package Bogus or a json file.
-
Should I give a copy of the database to the developer
That reminds me of Bogus which also generates dummy data that I've been using for sometime now.
-
Best practices for organising Mock Data & Repositories in Testing
To do all this you need test though...and that's where ]Bogus](https://github.com/bchavez/Bogus) and Auto Bogus come in handy. They both generate semi random test data that you can use to populate whatever method you've decided to use. You can setup rules so for specific fields, they have built in generators for common things like names and addresses. Auto Bogus can be used to populate large/complicated objects with data automatically (it can be slow if you don't use .WithRecursiveDepth() or.WithTreeDepth() )
-
Do you guys mock everything in your Unit Tests?
Bogus - For creating fake data Verify - Snapshot testing for .NET MELT - For testing ILogger usage Stryker - Mutation Testing for .NET TestContainers - run docker programmatically in integration tests
-
WinForms communicate between forms
To keep things interesting Bogus library is used to create a Person instance.
- bchavez/Bogus: fake data generator for C#
-
The art of Deconstructing
Usage with mocked data using Bogus NuGet package.
-
Nuget Packages in Class Libraries
I would say the issue is either a general issue with how Revit loads the addin, or maybe an issue with conflicts in your transitive dependencies. You can do some tests to try to figure out which. Try making a barebones Revit addin that uses a library that has no dependencies and isn't likely to be used in Revit. I'd suggest Bogus, you can use it generate a few pieces of test data and log them/display in the UI/whatever. If that works, then it would appear that Revit is fine with your addin having dependencies (which I would expect).
What are some alternatives?
App.Metrics - App Metrics is an open-source and cross-platform .NET library used to record and report metrics within an application.
AutoFixture - AutoFixture is an open source library for .NET designed to minimize the 'Arrange' phase of your unit tests in order to maximize maintainability. Its primary goal is to allow developers to focus on what is being tested rather than how to setup the test scenario, by making it easier to create object graphs containing test data.
CodeMaid - CodeMaid is an open source Visual Studio extension to cleanup and simplify our C#, C++, F#, VB, PHP, PowerShell, JSON, XAML, XML, ASP, HTML, CSS, LESS, SCSS, JavaScript and TypeScript coding.
faker-cs - C# port of the Ruby Faker gem (http://faker.rubyforge.org/)
Metrics-Net - The Metrics.NET library provides a way of instrumenting applications with custom metrics (timers, histograms, counters etc) that can be reported in various ways and can provide insights on what is happening inside a running application.
Moq - Repo for managing Moq 4.x [Moved to: https://github.com/moq/moq]
StyleCop - Analyzes C# source code to enforce a set of style and consistency rules.
NBuilder - Rapid generation of test objects in .NET
.NET Compiler Platform ("Roslyn") Analyzers
FakeItEasy - The easy mocking library for .NET
AspNet.Metrics - No longer maintained, instead see - https://github.com/alhardy/AppMetrics/
GenFu - GenFu is a library you can use to generate realistic test data. It is composed of several property fillers that can populate commonly named properties through reflection using an internal database of values or randomly created data. You can override any of the fillers, give GenFu hints on how to fill them.