AutoMoq
AutoFixture
Our great sponsors
| AutoMoq | AutoFixture | |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 11 | |
| 191 | 3,210 | |
| - | 0.4% | |
| 0.0 | 4.9 | |
| almost 3 years ago | 8 days ago | |
| C# | C# | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
AutoMoq
We haven't tracked posts mentioning AutoMoq yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
AutoFixture
-
API: Go, .NET, Rust
Yes, it does feel like some of the "standard stuff" in other more nuanced languages are missing (especially miss AutoFixture ngl). Some of those are a conscious decison by the golang team for example.
-
Integration Testing Postgres Store
Our first test is very easy, I like to name my tests as MethodName_GivenCondition_ShouldExpectedResult to follow the pattern, I have added GetById_GivenRecordDoesNotExist_ShouldReturnNull and I am going to leavarage excellent AutoFixture to get a new Guid as parameter. For this test we don't need arrange part, we would skip to the act and then assert. For Assertion I am going to use FluentAssertions. For this test we need to assert the returned result is null.
-
Setting up a simple testing project with C#
The next test to talk about, is that if this was a bank, we would have multiple customers, who can hold multiple accounts that we need to calculate the interest for. You could manually construct these objects if you want, but I'm going to use a package called AutoFixture to make life easier.
- Integration tests without API dependencies with ASP.NET Core and WireMock.Net
-
I need a C# crash course for experienced developers
AutoFixture
-
Reduce your tests cognitive complexity with AutoFixture
Ensuring that your test is still readable and not bloated by the setup of those variables may be quite a challenge but hopefully no more with AutoFixture, let's see how!
-
Practical complex data for unit testing
One neat library for creating and generating test data is AutoFixture. The creators describe it as follows:
-
14 .NET packages I always recommend
First time I heard of Bogus, looks interesting, been using AutoFixture for those will definitely take a look at it.
- LPT: There is a library called Bogus, you should know it exists much earlier than I did in my career.
-
Cell CMS - Criando testes de maneira prática
AutoFixture / AutoFixture
What are some alternatives?
Bogus - :card_index: A simple fake data generator for C#, F#, and VB.NET. Based on and ported from the famed faker.js.
NSubstitute - A friendly substitute for .NET mocking libraries.
Moq - Repo for managing Moq 4.x [Moved to: https://github.com/moq/moq]
FakeItEasy - The easy mocking library for .NET
NBuilder - Rapid generation of test objects in .NET
FsCheck - Random Testing for .NET
MSTest - MSTest framework and adapter
Fluent Assertions - A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.1, .NET Core 3.0, .NET 6, .NET Standard 2.0 and 2.1. Supports the unit test frameworks MSTest2, NUnit3, XUnit2, MSpec, and NSpec3.
SpecFlow - #1 .NET BDD Framework. SpecFlow automates your testing & works with your existing code. Find Bugs before they happen. Behavior Driven Development helps developers, testers, and business representatives to get a better understanding of their collaboration
GenFu - GenFu is a library you can use to generate realistic test data. It is composed of several property fillers that can populate commonly named properties through reflection using an internal database of values or randomly created data. You can override any of the fillers, give GenFu hints on how to fill them.