AutoMapper
crater
Our great sponsors
AutoMapper | crater | |
---|---|---|
29 | 23 | |
9,738 | 608 | |
0.6% | 2.5% | |
8.1 | 7.8 | |
11 days ago | 17 days ago | |
C# | Rust | |
MIT License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
AutoMapper
-
Object Mapping in .NET
AutoMapper
- New Google Bard Update (can run code)
-
AutoMapper's open source code of conduct
The only interesting one I found was https://github.com/AutoMapper/AutoMapper/issues/4226 and again, that wasn't automapper's issue, but just how expression engine in C# works. And author resolved it by himself.
While AutoMapper's use has its pros and cons this post is about their code of conduct on their GitHub repository, consider it a rant, or not.
-
Nightclub Website
AutoMapper - well for automapping
-
How to avoid AutoMapper configuration runtime errors
When working with AutoMapper, we often bump into runtime errors due to invalid mapping configuration, such as this one:
-
How to Build a WEB API ASP.NET Core 6
What problems will resolve automapper?
-
We released a new version of ShapeShift (0.4.0) - A lightweight Kotlin first library for Object Mapping. Would love to hear your thoughts!
I'm wondering myself. Most mappers like https://automapper.org/ will make a best effort mapper automatically via introspection. If this is just a DSL/annotation suite that requires explicit, complete mapping implementations then this strikes me as a re-implementation of parts of kotlin in kotlin.
-
Could someone point me towards a resorce to better understand how Automapper is supposed to be set up and configured?
If you wan't to know some internals, just read the source code, automapper is opensourced.
crater
-
Semver violations are common, better tooling is the answer
yup, they reference it as an inspiration: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
it's probably impossible to automate an entire ecosystem, and there is value to enabling a tighter integration within a project ecosystem (a subset of the language ecosystem).
-
Trip Summer ISO C++ standards meeting (Varna, Bulgaria)
Rather than hypothesising about an imagined tool you could look at the actual tool which of course is in Rust's source code repo: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
> new proposed C++ changes - are checked against only easily and "well-known" accessible package.
Now that I have, so to say, shown you mine, lets see yours. Where is the tool to perform these checks in C++?
-
GCC 13 and the state of gccrs
The "break things" part of "move fast" is not essential, Rust cares so much about breakage they literally compile and run the tests for every crate on crates.io and github using a tool called Crater. They do this just to test changes, even for stuff thats documented to be unstable, because thats just courtesy. And tooling makes it trivial to switch between Rust versions.
-
Improving Rust compile times to enable adoption of memory safety
See https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
-
Discussion about the state of neovim's plugin ecosystem
Rust compiler developers use a tool called Crater to test potentially breaking compiler changes on all crates (Rust's name for libraries) uploaded to the official repository. If plugin stability is the issue, maybe a solution along these lines would be better than merging these plugins to Neovim's core?
-
Experienced C++ users: what do you like about Rust? How would you sell it to other C++ users?
https://github.com/rust-lang/crater is the bot they use to test proposed compiler/stdlib changes against slices of the crates.io library up to and including "all of it".
-
Data-driven performance optimization with Rust and Miri
The tool you're referring to is called Crater: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater.
- GHC 9.4.2 regresses being able to do math on aarch64
-
Rust for Linux officially merged
I'm pretty certain this isn't actually true. You should look at the editions, etc. Rust also has an insane guarantee which I am certain C/C++ don't offer: It rebuilds its entire library ecosystem each time it ships to make sure nothing breaks (https://crater.rust-lang.org). I've never seen an instance were old code didn't compile on a new compiler. Rust isn't forwards compatible (new code compiles on an old compiler) of course, but what is?
-
Win32 Is the Only Stable ABI on Linux
You cut out a key word:
> Linux is really hurt here by the total lack of any unit testing or UI scripting standards.
> standards
I've been very impressed reading how the Rust developers handle this. They have a tool called crater[1], which runs regression tests for the compiler against all Rust code ever released on crates.io or GitHub. Every front-facing change that is even slightly risky must pass a crater run.
https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
Surely Microsoft has internal tools for Windows that do the same thing: run a battery of tests across popular apps and make sure nothing in the OS breaks any user apps.
Where's the similar test harness for Linux you can run that tests hundreds of popular apps across Wayland/X11 and Gnome/KDE/XFCE and makes sure everything still works?
What are some alternatives?
Mapster - A fast, fun and stimulating object to object Mapper
mapperly - A .NET source generator for generating object mappings. No runtime reflection.
GraphQL for .NET - GraphQL for .NET
Mapping Generator - :arrows_counterclockwise: "AutoMapper" like, Roslyn based, code fix provider that allows to generate mapping code in design time.
Hot Chocolate - Welcome to the home of the Hot Chocolate GraphQL server for .NET, the Strawberry Shake GraphQL client for .NET and Banana Cake Pop the awesome Monaco based GraphQL IDE.
ExpressMapper - Mapping .Net types
AgileMapper - A zero-configuration, highly-configurable, unopinionated object mapper with viewable execution plans. Flattens, unflattens, deep clones, merges, updates and projects queries. .NET 3.5+ and .NET Standard 1.0+.
NancyFx - Lightweight, low-ceremony, framework for building HTTP based services on .Net and Mono. Note: This project is no longer maintained and has been archived.
MediatR - Simple, unambitious mediator implementation in .NET
ServiceStack - Thoughtfully architected, obscenely fast, thoroughly enjoyable web services for all
WexFlow - An easy and fast way to build automation and workflows on Windows, Linux, macOS, and the cloud.
Xamarin.Essentials - Essential cross platform APIs for your mobile apps.