ApacheKafka VS dramatiq

Senden an Kafka (d. h. Senden der Daten an Apache Kafka)

Stream-processing platforms such as Apache Kafka, Apache Pulsar, or Redpanda are specifically engineered to foster event-driven communication in a distributed system and they can be a great choice for developing loosely coupled applications. Stream processing platforms analyze data in motion, offering near-zero latency advantages. For example, consider an alert system for monitoring factory equipment. If a machine's temperature exceeds a certain threshold, a streaming platform can instantly trigger an alert and engineers do timely maintenance.

Apache Kafka is a distributed streaming platform capable of handling high throughput of data, while ReductStore is a databases for unstructured data optimized for storing and querying along time.

*Push data *(original source image, GPS, timestamp) in a common place (Apache Kafka,...)

RabbitMQ comes with administrative tools to manage user permissions and broker security and is perfect for low latency message delivery and complex routing. In comparison, Apache Kafka architecture provides secure event streams with Transport Layer Security(TLS) and is best suited for big data use cases requiring the best throughput.

Apache Kafka is a distributed streaming platform to share data between applications and services in real-time.

also, this knowledge applies to learning more about data engineering, as this field of software engineering relies heavily on the event-driven approach via tools like Spark, Flink, Kafka, etc.

Using something like Dramatiq [1] with Redis, writing a background job takes minutes, and can be deployed alongside an existing Python web app. There are probably JS equivalents.

I think Inngest could be a useful service, but the comparison felt off for me - it made me feel like this wasn't solving a real problem.

[1] https://dramatiq.io/

Dramatiq documentation

Hello everyone. We want to present you Taskiq: our new project that allows sending tasks using distributed queues. Conceptually it's similar to Celery or Dramatiq but with full asyncio and type hints support. Taskiq can send and execute async functions and has many integrations with different queue implementations.

I spent 3 years building a high scale crawler on top of Celery.

I can't recommend it. We found many bugs in the more advanced features of Celery (like Canvas) we also ran into some really weird issues like tasks getting duplicated for no reason [1].

The most concerning problem is that the project was abandoned. The original creator is not working on it anymore and all issues that we raised were ignored. We had to fork the project and apply our own fixes to it. This was 4 years ago so maybe things improved since them.

Celery is also extremely complex.

I would recommend https://dramatiq.io/ instead.

[1]: https://github.com/celery/celery/issues/4426

I have been using dramatiq lately (celery alternative) and so far I'm happy with it.

this is a more robust solution. https://dramatiq.io/

Dramatiq -> Just another celery?