AECforWebAssembly
tauri
Our great sponsors
AECforWebAssembly | tauri | |
---|---|---|
51 | 469 | |
31 | 76,929 | |
- | 2.5% | |
8.2 | 9.8 | |
28 days ago | 5 days ago | |
C++ | Rust | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
AECforWebAssembly
-
Gren 0.3: Source maps
Great! I have not yet made source maps for my programming language that compiles to WebAssembly, and I probably never will.
- Mislite li da okolina ima potpuno pogrešno mišljenje o ljudima koji rade u IT-u?
- Koja je najapsurdnija poruka o pogrešci koju je neki vaš program ispisivao?
-
What is the most absurd error message your compiler/interpreter was once outputting?
Up until today, my AEC-to-WebAssembly was, if somebody tried to use two structures of different types as the second and the third operand to the ?: (ternary conditional) operator, as in this example: ``` Structure First Consists Of Nothing; EndStructure
- Poteškoće s pronalaskom posla
-
Good languages for writing compilers in?
Well, I have written the first compiler for my programming language, targetting x86, in IE6-compatible JavaScript, and the second compiler, targetting WebAssembly, has been written in C++11. I think that, to choose a language to write a compiler in, you need to look at at least two things:
-
Why does GCC run in Docker produce around 30% smaller statically linked C++ executables than GCC run on Linux? AECforWebAssembly is 1.08 MB large if compiled using GCC 13.1 in Docker, but it is 1.59 MB if compiled using GCC 13.1 on Debian.
You can see the releases v2.5.3 and v2.5.2 of AECforWebAssembly on GitHub. They are produced with the same version of GCC, the only difference (as far as I know) is that v2.5.2 was produced directly on Debian, whereas v2.5.3 was cross-compiled from Windows to Linux using Docker.
-
Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option
That could be true. I host my AEC-to-WebAssembly compiler on GitHub, GitLab and SourceForge, and it's only on GitHub that it has 21 stars and 2 forks. On GitLab and SourceForge, it has zero of both.
- koliko vam je bilo tesko nac posao u programiranju?
-
Does the JVM / CLR even make sense nowadays?
Well, the main compiler for my programming language is targetting the JavaScript Virtual Machine by outputting WebAssembly. I think it's even better than targetting Java Virtual Machine, because, for one thing, your executables can run in any modern browser if you output WebAssembly. If you target Java Virtual Machine, the users need to actually download your app. Furthermore, there is an official assembler for WebAssembly called WebAssembly Binary Toolkit (WABT), so your compiler can output assembly and not have to deal with binary files. There is nothing equivalent to that for Java Virtual Machine.
tauri
-
Tauri CRUD Boilerplate
Hi, dear Tauri! Long time no see. I published my first post, Developing a Desktop Application via Rust and NextJS. The Tauri Way almost a year ago. Since then, Tauri has become stronger. I'm happy about that! And now, I am very pleased to make a useful contribution to the Tauri community. As a full-stack developer, I frequently face situations where I need to start a DB-based UI project as fast as possible. It's stressful if I need to start the project from 100% scratch. I prefer to keep some boilerplates on hand, which will save me time and nerves and will be the subject of this article.
-
Show HN: Floro – Visual Version Control for static assets and strings
Hey Thanks!
Just electron & vite. I might actually migrate off electron, Tauri (https://tauri.app/) seems to be getting more stable and it's gotten great reviews.
I think this is the boilerplate I used though https://github.com/cawa-93/vite-electron-builder.
-
3D and 2D: Testing out my cross-platform graphics engine
Well the great thing about WebAssembly is that you can port QT or anything else to be at a layer below -- thanks to WebAssembly Interface Types[0] and the Component Model specification that works underneath that.
To over-simplify, the Component Model manages language interop, and WIT constrains the boundaries with interfaces.
IMO the problem here is defining a 90% solution for most window, tab, button, etc management, then building embeddings in QT, Flutter/Skia, and other lower level engines. Getting a good cross-platform way of doing data passing, triggering re-renders, serializing window state is probably the meat of the interesting work.
On top of that, you really need great UX. This is normally where projects fall short -- why should I use this solution instead of something like Tauri[2] which is excellent or Electron?
[0]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model/blob/main/des...
[1]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model/blob/main/des...
[2]: https://tauri.app/
-
Interview with Colin Lienard, Founder of GitLight
Welcome to the 2nd episode of our series “Building with Tauri”, where we chat with developers who build amazing projects and products using Tauri.
-
Building W-9 Crafter
Tauri seemed like the "thing" I should switch to because everybody loves Rust (heh), and because it ships significantly smaller apps.
-
Tauri + React + ShadcnUI
First of all, I will be using npm as my package manager but feel free to use whatever you prefer. Find more info here.
- Slint 1.5: Embracing Android, Improving Live-Preview, and Pythonic Slint
- Shoes makes building little graphical programs for Mac, Windows, Linux simple
-
Tauri - Rust, Js and Native Apps
Today I'm talking about Tauri! Do you know all the various tools that allow you to develop native applications starting from web languages? They often need an intermediate compilation, in the middle of which you end up encountering various problems not always transparent and directly solvable with a language mostly detached from native development. On the other hand, there's still the ease of developing attractive and easily usable interfaces, which are more difficult to develop with low level languages.
-
Why Bloat Is Still Software's Biggest Vulnerability
I think Tauri is the most established framework using that approach
What are some alternatives?
Lark - Lark is a parsing toolkit for Python, built with a focus on ergonomics, performance and modularity.
Wails - Create beautiful applications using Go
wasm-fizzbuzz - WebAssembly from Scratch: From FizzBuzz to DooM.
neutralinojs - Portable and lightweight cross-platform desktop application development framework
mal - mal - Make a Lisp
dioxus - Fullstack GUI library for web, desktop, mobile, and more.
Drogon-torch-serve - Serve pytorch / torch models using Drogon
Electron - :electron: Build cross-platform desktop apps with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS
libCat - 🐈⬛ A runtime for C++26 w/out libC or POSIX. Smaller binaries, only arena allocators, SIMD, stronger type safety than STL, and value-based errors!
egui - egui: an easy-to-use immediate mode GUI in Rust that runs on both web and native
gdal-js - This is an Emscripten port of GDAL, an open source X/MIT licensed translator library for raster and vector geospatial data formats.
iced - A cross-platform GUI library for Rust, inspired by Elm