AECforWebAssembly
buck2
Our great sponsors
AECforWebAssembly | buck2 | |
---|---|---|
51 | 31 | |
31 | 3,287 | |
- | 2.3% | |
8.2 | 10.0 | |
about 1 month ago | 6 days ago | |
C++ | Rust | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
AECforWebAssembly
-
Gren 0.3: Source maps
Great! I have not yet made source maps for my programming language that compiles to WebAssembly, and I probably never will.
- Mislite li da okolina ima potpuno pogrešno mišljenje o ljudima koji rade u IT-u?
- Koja je najapsurdnija poruka o pogrešci koju je neki vaš program ispisivao?
-
What is the most absurd error message your compiler/interpreter was once outputting?
Up until today, my AEC-to-WebAssembly was, if somebody tried to use two structures of different types as the second and the third operand to the ?: (ternary conditional) operator, as in this example: ``` Structure First Consists Of Nothing; EndStructure
- Poteškoće s pronalaskom posla
-
Good languages for writing compilers in?
Well, I have written the first compiler for my programming language, targetting x86, in IE6-compatible JavaScript, and the second compiler, targetting WebAssembly, has been written in C++11. I think that, to choose a language to write a compiler in, you need to look at at least two things:
-
Why does GCC run in Docker produce around 30% smaller statically linked C++ executables than GCC run on Linux? AECforWebAssembly is 1.08 MB large if compiled using GCC 13.1 in Docker, but it is 1.59 MB if compiled using GCC 13.1 on Debian.
You can see the releases v2.5.3 and v2.5.2 of AECforWebAssembly on GitHub. They are produced with the same version of GCC, the only difference (as far as I know) is that v2.5.2 was produced directly on Debian, whereas v2.5.3 was cross-compiled from Windows to Linux using Docker.
-
Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option
That could be true. I host my AEC-to-WebAssembly compiler on GitHub, GitLab and SourceForge, and it's only on GitHub that it has 21 stars and 2 forks. On GitLab and SourceForge, it has zero of both.
- koliko vam je bilo tesko nac posao u programiranju?
-
Does the JVM / CLR even make sense nowadays?
Well, the main compiler for my programming language is targetting the JavaScript Virtual Machine by outputting WebAssembly. I think it's even better than targetting Java Virtual Machine, because, for one thing, your executables can run in any modern browser if you output WebAssembly. If you target Java Virtual Machine, the users need to actually download your app. Furthermore, there is an official assembler for WebAssembly called WebAssembly Binary Toolkit (WABT), so your compiler can output assembly and not have to deal with binary files. There is nothing equivalent to that for Java Virtual Machine.
buck2
-
Tech Debt: My Rust Library Is Now a CDO
https://buck2.build/ https://github.com/facebook/buck2
Rust support is also rather good ;) https://github.com/facebookincubator/reindeer
-
Things I learned while building projects with NX
Buck 2 by Facebook
-
Declarative Gradle is a cool thing I am afraid of: Maven strikes back
NOTE: I won’t mention SBT and Leiningen here because, with all due respect, they are niche build tools. I also won’t discuss Kobalt for the same reason (besides, it’s no longer actively maintained). Additionally, I won’t touch upon Bazel and Buck in this context, mainly because I’m not very familiar with them. If you have insights or comments about these tools, please feel free to share them in the comments 👇
-
Reason to use other Build Tool than Make?
There's a new build system which works on similar ideas to buck: https://buck2.build/
-
Hello r/Rust! We are Meta Engineers who created the Open Source Buck2 Build System! Ask us anything! [Mod approved]
I don't think all these pieces are open source yet, but https://github.com/facebook/buck2/blob/main/prelude/rust/rust-analyzer/resolve_deps.bxl is a snippet that is used to drive Rust Analyzer
- [Buck2] Consider WASM Instead of Starlark
- Buck2
-
Buck2: Our open source build system
We have a small example project that demonstrates what that would look like with buck2: https://github.com/facebook/buck2/tree/main/examples/bootstrap
- Buck2 from Facebook
-
Build faster with Buck2: Our open source build system
There are a few references to NixOS on the code/issues.[0] I wonder what Meta's use case is for NixOS.
[0] https://github.com/facebook/buck2/search?q=nixos&type=issues
What are some alternatives?
Lark - Lark is a parsing toolkit for Python, built with a focus on ergonomics, performance and modularity.
turbo - Incremental bundler and build system optimized for JavaScript and TypeScript, written in Rust – including Turbopack and Turborepo.
wasm-fizzbuzz - WebAssembly from Scratch: From FizzBuzz to DooM.
Bazel - a fast, scalable, multi-language and extensible build system
mal - mal - Make a Lisp
HHVM - A virtual machine for executing programs written in Hack.
libCat - 🐈⬛ A runtime for C++26 w/out libC or POSIX. Smaller binaries, only arena allocators, SIMD, stronger type safety than STL, and value-based errors!
Vcpkg - C++ Library Manager for Windows, Linux, and MacOS
gdal-js - This is an Emscripten port of GDAL, an open source X/MIT licensed translator library for raster and vector geospatial data formats.
rfcs - RFC process for Bytecode Alliance projects
Drogon-torch-serve - Serve pytorch / torch models using Drogon
PyOxidizer - A modern Python application packaging and distribution tool