.NET-Obfuscator VS FrameworkBenchmarks

Compare .NET-Obfuscator vs FrameworkBenchmarks and see what are their differences.

.NET-Obfuscator

Lists of .NET Obfuscator (Free, Freemium, Paid and Open Source ) (by NotPrab)

FrameworkBenchmarks

Source for the TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks project (by TechEmpower)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
.NET-Obfuscator FrameworkBenchmarks
8 366
1,186 7,342
- 1.3%
0.9 9.8
about 1 year ago 6 days ago
Java
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

.NET-Obfuscator

Posts with mentions or reviews of .NET-Obfuscator. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-07-22.

FrameworkBenchmarks

Posts with mentions or reviews of FrameworkBenchmarks. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-25.
  • Why choose async/await over threads?
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Mar 2024
    Eh. Async and to a lesser extent green threads are the only solutions to slowloris HTTP attacks. I suppose your other option is to use a thread pool in your server - but then you need to but hide your web server behind nginx to keep it safe. (And it is safe because uses async IO).

    Async is also usually wildly faster for networked services than blocking IO + thread pools. Look at some of the winners of the techempower benchmarks. All of the top results use some form of non blocking IO. (Though a few honourable mentions use go - with presumably a green thread per request):

    https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/

    I’ve also never seen Python or Ruby get anywhere near the performance of nodejs (or C#) as a web server. A lot of the difference is probably how well tuned v8 and .net are, but I’m sure the async-everywhere nature of javascript makes a huge difference.

    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Mar 2024
    Neat. Thanks for sharing!

    Interestingly, may-minihttp is faring very well in the TechEmpower benchmark [1], for whatever those benchmarks are worth. The code is also surprisingly straightforward [2].

    [1] https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/

    [2] https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/mast...

  • Ntex: Powerful, pragmatic, fast framework for composable networking services
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Mar 2024
    ntex was formed after a schism in actix-web and Rust safety/unsafety, with ntex allowing more unsafe code for better performance.

    ntex is at the top of the TechEmpower benchmarks, although those benchmarks are not apples-to-apples since each uses its own tricks: https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#hw=ph&test=fortune&s...

  • A decent VS Code and Ruby on Rails setup
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 21 Feb 2024
    Ruby is slow. Very slow. How much you may ask? https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#hw=ph&test=fortune&s... fastest Ruby entry is at 272th place. Sure, top entries tend to have questionable benchmark-golfing implementations, but it gives you a good primer on the overhead imposed by Ruby.

    It is also not early 00s anymore, when you pick an interpreted language, you are not getting "better productivity and tooling". In fact, most interpreted languages lag behind other major languages significantly in the form of JS/TS, Python and Ruby suffering from different woes when it comes to package management and publishing. I would say only TS/JS manages to stand apart with being tolerable, and Python sometimes too by a virtue of its popularity and the amount of information out there whenever you need to troubleshoot.

    If you liked Go but felt it being a too verbose to your liking, give .NET a try. I am advocating for it here on HN mostly for fun but it is, in fact, highly underappreciated, considered unsexy and boring while it's anything but after a complete change of trajectory in the last 3-5 years. It is actually the* stack people secretly want but simply don't know about because it is bundled together with Java in the public perception.

    *productive CLI tooling, high performance, works well in a really wide range of workloads from low to high level, by far the best ORM across all languages and back-end framework that is easier to work with than Node.JS while consuming 0.1x resources

  • Ruby 3.3
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 24 Dec 2023
    RoR and whatever C++ based web backend there is count as a valid comparison in my book. But comparing the languages itself is maybe a bit off.

    On a side note, you can actually compare their performance here if you’re really curious. But take it with a grain of salt since these are synthetic benchmarks.

    https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks

  • API: Go, .NET, Rust
    3 projects | /r/dotnet | 9 Dec 2023
    Most benchmarks you'll find essentially have someone's thumb on the scale (intentionally or unintentionally). Most people won't know the different languages well enough to create comparable implementations and if you let different people create the implementations, cheating happens. The TechEmpower benchmarks aren't bad, but many implementations put their thumb on the scale (https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks). For example, a lot of the Go implementations avoid the GC by pre-allocating/reusing structs or allocate arrays knowing how big they need to be in advance (despite that being against the rules). At some point, it becomes "how many features have you turned off." Some Go http routers (like fasthttp and those built off it like Atreugo and Fiber) aren't actually correct and a lot of people in the Go community discourage their use, but they certainly top the benchmarks. Gin and Echo are usually the ones that are well-respected in the Go community.
  • Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails
    12 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 4 Dec 2023
    TechEmpower has a few different classes of benchmark. https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/

    Off the top of my head:

    - json serialization

    - fetching random objects from an actual mysql/psql database

    - cached queries

    - performing mutations / data updates

    writing "hello world" as a response is naturally going to do 75k per second

    12 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 4 Dec 2023
    There is certainly a lot of speculation in Techempower benchmarks and top entries can utilize questionable techniques like simply writing a byte array literal to output stream instead of constructing a response, or (in the past) DB query coalescing to work around inherent limitations of the DB in case of Fortunes or DB quries.

    And yet, the fastest Ruby entry is at 274th place while Rails is at 427th.

    https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#hw=ph&test=fortune&s...

  • Node.js – v20.8.1
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 15 Oct 2023
    oh what machine? with how many workers? doing what?

    search for "node" on this page: https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r21

  • Strong typing, a hill I'm willing to die on
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 4 Oct 2023

What are some alternatives?

When comparing .NET-Obfuscator and FrameworkBenchmarks you can also consider the following projects:

Introducing .NET Multi-platform App UI (MAUI) - .NET MAUI is the .NET Multi-platform App UI, a framework for building native device applications spanning mobile, tablet, and desktop.

zio-http - A next-generation Scala framework for building scalable, correct, and efficient HTTP clients and servers

drogon - Drogon: A C++14/17 based HTTP web application framework running on Linux/macOS/Unix/Windows [Moved to: https://github.com/drogonframework/drogon]

LiteNetLib - Lite reliable UDP library for Mono and .NET

django-ninja - 💨 Fast, Async-ready, Openapi, type hints based framework for building APIs

C++ REST SDK - The C++ REST SDK is a Microsoft project for cloud-based client-server communication in native code using a modern asynchronous C++ API design. This project aims to help C++ developers connect to and interact with services.

SQLBoiler - Generate a Go ORM tailored to your database schema.

Laravel - The Laravel Framework.

CoreWCF - Main repository for the Core WCF project

Spiral Framework - High-Performance PHP Framework

web-frameworks - Which is the fastest web framework?

dotnet-script - Run C# scripts from the .NET CLI.